Thanks! Why is LEAP much safer? Technically I can lose about

來源: aloevera 於 2024-12-06 12:23:45 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (118 bytes)
本帖於 2024-12-06 12:24:16 時間, 由普通用戶 aloevera 編輯
回答: yes, if NVDA keeps going up. NVDL is better 由 三心三意 於 2024-12-06 12:20:34

 the same value on LEAP vs. NVDL. LEAP premium is $70, whereas NVDL cost $76, not much difference. 

所有跟帖： 

• Leap only lose time value... -三心三意- ♂ 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 (161 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:46:36

• But if it comes back, will that eat into the return as much？ -aloevera- ♀ 給 aloevera 發送悄悄話 (140 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:52:28

• If NVDA drops 40-50% and come back, NVDL lose a lot more -三心三意- ♂ 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:57:27

• Not precise math (maybe someone with better math to help) .. -三心三意- ♂ 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 (204 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 13:03:21

• That is right! Thanks for explanation!! But I hope that -aloevera- ♀ 給 aloevera 發送悄悄話 (494 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 13:18:52

• The time decay on LEAP is 11% on the premium. That is quite -aloevera- ♀ 給 aloevera 發送悄悄話 (233 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:59:22

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！