yes, if NVDA keeps going up. NVDL is better

來源: 三心三意 於 2024-12-06 12:20:34 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (89 bytes)

But leap is much safer without losing much return. Market always does unexpected

所有跟帖： 

• Thanks! Why is LEAP much safer? Technically I can lose about -aloevera- ♀ 給 aloevera 發送悄悄話 (118 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:23:45

• Leap only lose time value... -三心三意- ♂ 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 (161 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:46:36

• But if it comes back, will that eat into the return as much？ -aloevera- ♀ 給 aloevera 發送悄悄話 (140 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:52:28

• If NVDA drops 40-50% and come back, NVDL lose a lot more -三心三意- ♂ 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:57:27

• Not precise math (maybe someone with better math to help) .. -三心三意- ♂ 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 (204 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 13:03:21

• That is right! Thanks for explanation!! But I hope that -aloevera- ♀ 給 aloevera 發送悄悄話 (494 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 13:18:52

• The time decay on LEAP is 11% on the premium. That is quite -aloevera- ♀ 給 aloevera 發送悄悄話 (233 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:59:22

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！