my point was "GROWTH" than preservation

來源: 大家幫我買房 於 2012-03-06 19:46:57 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (227 bytes)
回答: you are missing the point here,,, 由 hercules007 於 2012-03-06 19:37:07


Gold might be ok for purchasing power preservation. But you cannot count on gold for growth. You have to invest to gain the growth. Investing in equities will definitely outperform holding gold.

my 2 cents.

所有跟帖： 

• true, but you forgot one thing -朱哥靚- ♂ 給 朱哥靚 發送悄悄話 朱哥靚 的博客首頁 (225 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 20:39:35

• i think it's personal style -大家幫我買房- ♂ 給 大家幫我買房 發送悄悄話 大家幫我買房 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 22:55:39

• That arguments is not correct -天下多蚤- ♀ 給 天下多蚤 發送悄悄話 (589 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 21:42:40

• 回複：That arguments is not correct -大家幫我買房- ♂ 給 大家幫我買房 發送悄悄話 大家幫我買房 的博客首頁 (531 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 22:58:33

• 你的巨大誤區，，，回複：my point was "GROWTH" than preservation -hercules007- ♂ 給 hercules007 發送悄悄話 hercules007 的博客首頁 (380 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 21:46:23

• 其實你和我說的差不多 -大家幫我買房- ♂ 給 大家幫我買房 發送悄悄話 大家幫我買房 的博客首頁 (327 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 22:54:30

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！