These are two concepts

來源: beachlver 於 2012-04-22 12:27:41 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (659 bytes)

completely not relevant.

PM will not shoulder your liability as the landlord.

LLC, as a separate business and legal entity, in theory can separate your rental liability from your other personal asset. That has absolutely nothing to do with the PM.

Of course, if you have a way to let a PM sign the legal document stating that by charging you 8-12% of the rent every month, he is going to assume 100% liability for you, then it is a completely different story.

The reality sucks. 99% of the PM will let you sign just the opposite - by charing you a monthly PM fee, he is NOT assuming any liability on your behalf.... haha

所有跟帖： 

• 哈哈，完全同意！（學領導批示：-P）。但是另一方麵看， -如山- ♂ 給 如山 發送悄悄話 如山 的博客首頁 (89 bytes) () 04/22/2012 postreply 12:49:37

• Exactly! 這正是我的問題所在。。。 -大俠小李飛刀- ♂ 給 大俠小李飛刀 發送悄悄話 (265 bytes) () 04/22/2012 postreply 14:20:25

• Mostly not true unfortunately -beachlver- ♂ 給 beachlver 發送悄悄話 (1003 bytes) () 04/22/2012 postreply 15:21:46

• I agree the tenant should report any issue and PM　ｒｅｓｏｎｄ．．． -大俠小李飛刀- ♂ 給 大俠小李飛刀 發送悄悄話 (179 bytes) () 04/22/2012 postreply 17:05:00

• If I do not sign any doc with tenants, do I still bear any oblig -85858585- ♀ 給 85858585 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2012 postreply 23:40:57

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！