個人資料
正文

支持以色列 美國國務院官員辭職反對

(2023-10-22 05:21:37) 下一個

對拜登政府以色列政策不滿 “美國務院各層都在醞釀兵變”

 

繼美國國務院政治軍事事務局主任喬希·保羅(JoshPaul)因不滿軍援以色列辭職之後,據《赫芬頓郵報》當地時間19日報道,美國務院許多官員透露,有更多的人準備正式向拜登政府就巴以衝突的處理方式提出反對意見,越來越多的人考慮像保羅一樣辭職,還有人則在籌備一份批評美對以外交政策的內部“異議電報”。

文章稱,對於拜登政府的巴以政策,“整個國務院內部的各個層麵都在醞釀兵變(Mutiny Brewing)。”

新一輪巴以衝突升級後,美國已向以色列提供大量軍備援助,美國總統拜登訪問以色列時,還承諾繼續敦促國會為援助以色列撥款。

兩名美國國務院官員告訴《赫芬頓郵報》,外交官們準備了一份反對美國對以色列外交政策的“異議電報”。據報道,美國務院官員有一個能夠直接向高層發出警告或表達相反觀點的、受保護的內部異議渠道,即“異議電報”。

報道中並未提到國務院內部參與“異議電報”的具體人數規模,但《赫芬頓郵報》稱,這份電報的措辭之嚴厲,以及聯署簽名的人數之多,將反映出國務院內部對於目前美國對加沙局勢反應的震驚程度,以及對拜登政府決策不同意見的廣泛程度,這有可能決定美國對以政策是否會“轉向”。

報道稱,在美國國務院資深官員喬希·保羅因不滿拜登軍援以色列,於當地時間周三宣布辭職後,這份電報隨之發出。

保羅在美國國務院分管武器交易的政治軍事事務局工作超過11年,近期負責處理涉國會和公共關係事務。18日,他在公開辭職信中稱,自己“無法承受因軍援以色列產生的道德妥協”,並尖銳地批評美國政府向以色列提供致命武器的決定“具有破壞性、短視、不公正”。

他接受《赫芬頓郵報》采訪時坦言,自己已經無力改變美國引發爭議的軍售政策,無法在美國政府內部推動“更人道的政策”。他認為,這份“異議電報”確實有可能會對高層領導產生影響。

與此同時,保羅宣布辭職在美國務院引發震動。他接受采訪時說,許多在聯邦政府和國會工作的同事對他表示“完全理解”,說有“相似感受”,這讓他很吃驚。

“在過去的24小時裏,我收到了很多同事的聯係,他們的支持非常鼓舞人心。”保羅連連表示這一情況出人預料,“我的預期是沒有人會來接觸我……因為任何與以色列有關的事情都很敏感。”

而他的辭職,仿佛成為了推動美國務院內部反對以色列政策的第一塊多米諾骨牌。據《赫芬頓郵報》報道,多名國務院官員透露,除了參與“異議電報”,他們曾聽到許多同事說要像保羅那樣辭職離開。

“基本上,現在國務院內部各個層麵都在醞釀‘兵變’。”一名官員向《赫芬頓郵報》直言不諱道。據報道,拜登政府對巴以新一輪衝突的處理方式,正在加劇美國國務院,這個在美國外交政策中發揮最重要作用的政府機構內部的緊張狀態。

雖然關鍵政策是拜登、布林肯和其他少數幾個人在最高層決定的,但正如美國常駐聯合國代表18日在安理會“一票否決”巴以決議草案,在開展一係列重要又極具爭議的具體工作的,是美國務院的大部分普通官員。

報道稱,如今他們在這一議題上進行的外交活動相當“微妙”:既要響應美國國會的呼籲,展示對以色列的巨大支持和對巴勒斯坦人生命的尊重,同時還得為美國掩護以色列過度暴力所引發的全球憤怒“滅火”。但即便非常努力,他們還是收到了阿拉伯國家同行們傳來的消息———拜登政府的行為可能導致美國在阿拉伯地區失去一代人的支持。

一些官員告訴《赫芬頓郵報》,國務院內部由此產生了普遍存在的“挫敗感”。很多人認為,布林肯及其外交團隊對於專家建議根本不感興趣,他們隻專注於支持以色列不斷擴大在加沙地帶的行動。

國務院內部的負麵情緒也正以各種方式浮現。一名官員形容自己的同事們正對發生的一切“感到沮喪和憤怒”,另一人還回憶起他有位同事直接在會議上哭了出來,因為他們發現“美國的政策聲明強調對以色列的支持,而不是巴勒斯坦人的生命”。

除了不認可美國對以政策,還有一部分人則表示,他們擔心對以色列行為的質疑會導致自己成為攻擊目標,在工作中遭到報複,政府內部對巴以衝突的看法出現了一種“沉默文化”,很多人正在經曆工作中的“寒蟬效應”,更有人直言自己對目前在美國政府內部工作感到“羞愧”。

“這就是民主黨和共和黨政府共同營造的一種環境。如果你在聯邦政府工作,質疑以色列的任何行為,你就會被排擠、被壓製。”前五角大樓和國土安全部官員薩拉·哈裏森(SarahHarrison)如是評價。

《赫芬頓郵報》稱,國務院的一些工作人員還提到,他們認為,布林肯的政策副幕僚長、拜登心腹之一、美國國家安全顧問傑克·沙利文的弟弟,湯姆·沙利文,是這些不滿情緒滋生的“罪魁禍首”。

據他們所說,湯姆·沙利文一貫反對國務卿加強與國務院工作人員們更廣泛接觸的想法,他在高層會議上通常也會重點詢問或強調以色列的需求。不過,鑒於沙利文兄弟倆在拜登政府位高權重,因此即便大家心生不滿,也不願意給自己找麻煩。

文章稱,目前還不清楚布林肯是否了解到他的部門正在經曆一場“士氣危機”,雖然在工作人員們看來,這位國務卿沒看到或者壓根不在乎整個團隊的狀態之糟糕。

周四晚上,布林肯發布了一條全體信息,以感謝國務院同僚們對他早前中東之行的貢獻,並呼籲在內部確保維持和擴大辯論與異議的空間,“我知道,對你們中的許多人來說,這段時間不僅是職業上的挑戰,對個人來說也是如此……你們並不孤單,我們與你們同在。”

當天早些時候,國務院發言人馬修·米勒還在講話中表示,“這個部門的優勢之一就是我們確實有持不同意見的人。當然,製定政策的是總統,但我們鼓勵每個人直抒己見,即使他們不同意我們的政策,也要讓……他們的領導知道。”

Exclusive: 'Mutiny Brewing' Inside State Department Over Israel-Palestine Policy

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/state-department-gaza_n_6531a23ae4b0da897ab75ce4

State Department Official Resigns Over Arms Transfers to Israel

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/19/us/state-department-official-resigns-israel-arms.html

Josh Paul spent more than 11 years as the director of congressional and public affairs at the bureau that oversees arms transfers to foreign nations.

John IsmayBy John Ismay  Oct. 19, 2023

 

A State Department official in the bureau that oversees arms transfers resigned this week in protest of the Biden administration’s decision to continue sending weapons and ammunition to Israel as it lays siege to Gaza in its war with Hamas.

In his resignation letter, Josh Paul, who has been the director of congressional and public affairs for the State Department's Bureau of Political-Military Affairs for over 11 years, said the Biden administration's “blind support for one side” was leading to policy decisions that were “shortsighted, destructive, unjust and contradictory to the very values we publicly espouse.”

“The response Israel is taking, and with it the American support both for that response and for the status quo of the occupation, will only lead to more and deeper suffering for both the Israeli and the Palestinian people,” he wrote, adding, “I fear we are repeating the same mistakes we have made these past decades, and I decline to be a part of it for longer.”

In an interview, Mr. Paul said that Israel's cutting off of water, food, medical care and electricity to the Gaza Strip, a region of two million people, should prompt protections in a number of longstanding federal laws intended to keep American weapons out of the hands of human rights violators. But those legal guardrails are failing, he said.

“The problem with all of those provisions is that it rests on the executive branch making a determination that human rights violations have occurred,” Mr. Paul said. “The decision to make a determination doesn’t rest with some nonpartisan academic entity, and there’s no incentive for the president to actually determine anything.”

A State Department representative declined to comment, saying the agency does not discuss personnel matters.

“This administration, I think, knows better and understands some of the complexity, but brought very little of that nuance to the policy decisions that are being made,” said Josh Paul, who resigned from the State Department.

Mr. Biden has embraced Israel since Hamas killed more than 1,400 people and took nearly 200 hostages in an attack early this month, and his administration is preparing a request of $14 billion in mostly military aid, according to officials familiar with the plan. But in a visit to Tel Aviv on Wednesday, Mr. Biden also warned Israelis not to give in to “an all-consuming rage” that could drive the country too far in response, and his administration has pushed Israel to limit civilian deaths.

Israel has said that the scale and gruesomeness of Hamas’s attack justify its response and that it is acting in compliance with international law.

Mr. Paul, whose resignation was reported earlier by HuffPost, said that he had seen the U.S. government approve numerous sales or shipments of matériel to other Middle Eastern countries, even when he believed federal law should have prevented them from going forward.

“On all of them there’s a moment where you can say, OK, well, you know, it’s out of my hands, but I know Congress is going to push back,” he said, by issuing a hold on the transfer or grilling officials in hearings at the Capitol. “But in this instance, there isn’t any significant pushback likely from Congress, there isn’t any other oversight mechanism, there isn’t any other forum for debate, and that’s part of what got into my decision making.”

Continuing to give Israel what he described as carte blanche to kill a generation of enemies, only to create a new one, does not ultimately serve the United States’ interests, Mr. Paul said.

“What it leads to is this desire to sort of impose security at any cost, including in cost to the Palestinian civilian population,” he said. “And that doesn’t ultimately lead to security.”

“This administration, I think, knows better and understands some of the complexity but brought very little of that nuance to the policy decisions that are being made.”

Since posting his resignation letter online Wednesday, Mr. Paul said he had received an outpouring of support from State Department colleagues and congressional staff members.

“A lot of people are wrestling with this being the current policy and are finding it to be deeply problematic,” he said. “I’ve really been quite moved by some of the folks who have reached out to say that they understand where I’m coming from. They respect my decision. It’s been very supportive.”

Exclusive: ‘Mutiny Brewing’ Inside State Department Over Israel-Palestine Policy

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/state-department-gaza_n_6531a23ae4b0da897ab75ce4

Morale is low, and some staffers are preparing to formally express their opposition to President Joe Biden's approach, officials told HuffPost.

 
 By Akbar Shahid Ahmed Oct 19, 2023
 
The vast majority of Palestinians are not Hamas.00:4700:55

President Joe Biden’s approach to the ongoing violence in Israel and Palestine is fueling mounting tensions at the U.S. government agency most involved in foreign policy: the State Department.

Officials told HuffPost that Secretary of State Antony Blinken and his most senior advisers are overlooking widespread internal frustration. Some department staff said they feel as if Blinken and his team are uninterested in their own experts’ advice as they focus on supporting Israel’s expanding operation in Gaza, where the Palestinian militant group Hamas is based.

“There’s basically a mutiny brewing within State at all levels,” one State Department official said.

Since Hamas’ Oct. 7 terror attack on Israel, fighting in the region has killed more than 4,000 people, and Israel is preparing a ground invasion of Gaza that is expected to claim tens of thousands of additional lives.

Biden and Blinken say they want to help Israel decisively defeat Hamas, but that they do not want to see suffering among ordinary Gazans or a broader regional conflict. Both have recently visited Israel, and Blinken is prioritizing an attempt to open the Gaza-Egypt border to allow humanitarian aid into the besieged region and let some civilians out.

Two officials told HuffPost that diplomats are preparing what’s called a “dissent cable,” a document criticizing American policy that goes to the agency’s leaders through a protected internal channel.

Such cables are seen within the State Department as consequential statements of serious disagreement at key historical moments. The dissent channel was established amid deep internal conflict during the Vietnam War, and diplomats have since then used it to warn that the U.S. is making dangerous and self-defeating choices abroad.

The cable would come in the wake of Josh Paul, a veteran State Department official, announcing his resignation on Wednesday. After more than a decade of working on arms deals, he said, he could not morally support the U.S.’s moves to supply Israel’s war effort.

“In the last 24 hours, I’ve been getting an immense amount of outreach from colleagues... with really encouraging words of support and a lot of people saying they feel the same way and it’s very difficult for them,” said Paul, whose departure was first reported by HuffPost.

Paul described that as surprising: “My expectation was that no one would want to touch me with a 10-foot barge pole... because of the sensitivity of anything to do with Israel.”

Contacted for comment for this story on Thursday, a State Department representative directed HuffPost to remarks earlier in the day from agency spokesperson Matthew Miller.

“One of the strengths of this department is that we do have people with different opinions. We encourage them to make their opinions known,” Miller said in those remarks. “It, of course, is the president that sets policy, but we encourage everyone, even when they disagree with our policy, to let... their leadership know.”

“Secretary Blinken has spoken to this on a number of occasions, when he’s said that he welcomes people exercising the dissent channel,” he went on. “He finds it useful to get conflicting voices that may differ from his opinion. He takes it seriously, and it causes him to reflect on his own thinking in terms of policymaking.”

Biden and Blinken have publicly spoken of both Israel’s right to defend itself and their expectation that Israel will “abide by all international law,” Miller said.

 

“Multiple officials said they have heard colleagues talk about quitting.”

Key decisions are made at the highest level by Biden, Blinken and a handful of others. But rank-and-file State Department officials are involved in an array of other important and controversial elements of the American response to the Israeli-Palestinian violence.

On Wednesday, the U.S. mission to the United Nations ― a State office ― vetoed a U.N. resolution backed by many countries that condemned all violence against civilians, including by Hamas, and endorsed humanitarian aid for Gaza. State will also help administer the additional military aid for Israel and humanitarian assistance for Palestinians that Biden has authorized.

State Department staff are trying to simultaneously conduct delicate diplomacy, respond to calls from Congress to demonstrate huge support for Israel and regard for Palestinian lives, and manage global outrage over the impression that the U.S. is providing cover for excessive Israeli force.

Counterparts in Arab governments are telling State Department officials the U.S. is at risk of losing support in their region for a generation, a U.S. official told HuffPost.

It’s unclear whether Blinken — who returned to Washington on Wednesday after a five-day trip across the Middle East, during which he met with officials in seven countries — understands the crisis of morale in his department.

“There’s a sense within the workforce that the secretary doesn’t see it or doesn’t care,” a State Department official said, saying that the feeling extends to high-ranking figures at the agency. “And it’s almost certain he’s not aware of just how bad the workforce dynamics are. It’s really quite bad.”

The negativity is surfacing in a variety of ways. One official described peers as “depressed and angry about it all,” while another said some staff are experiencing “resignation.” That official recalled a colleague in tears during a meeting over their view “that U.S. policy statements emphasized support for Israel over the lives of Palestinians.”

Senior State Department officials have privately discouraged the agency from using three specific phrases in public statements, HuffPost revealed last week: “de-escalation/ceasefire,” “end to violence/bloodshed” and “restoring calm.”

In one office, a manager told their team that they know staff with extensive international experience are unhappy with Biden’s plan ― particularly the sense that the U.S. will do little to ensure Israeli restraint ― but they have little chance of changing it, an official present at the meeting said.

Multiple officials said they have heard colleagues talk about quitting as Paul did. One U.S. official described Paul’s decision as a shock and a major loss for the department.

The severity of the language in the dissent cable, and the number of State Department officials who sign it, will offer a picture of how alarmed staffers are at America’s response to the situation in Gaza and how broad the disagreement with Biden’s policy is ― and could determine whether it actually inspires a change in course.

Such cables often attract dozens or even hundreds of signatures, and the dissent channel is seen as a vital way to elevate opposing views without fear of retaliation because State’s policies bar retaliation against those who use it.

“I think it does make a difference to senior leadership,” Paul said.

But the process has been under threat this year, as House Republicans have pushed to access a dissent cable prepared amid Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan.

“The efforts to obtain the Afghanistan dissent cable by Congress do make it more difficult to talk about dissent cables in general, and do make some people think twice,” Paul said.

Global affairs professionals, particularly those with ties to the Muslim-majority world who worry about being targeted, have long been concerned about being seen as taking a stand on Israel-Palestine.

That anxiety has often affected policymaking, according to Sarah Harrison, a former Pentagon and Department of Homeland Security official now at the nonprofit Crisis Group.

“This is an environment that has been cultivated by Democratic and Republican administrations alike,” Harrison recently wrote on X. “If you work in the federal government and question anything Israel does you are sidelined and silenced.”

Staff across the Biden administration have told HuffPost they are experiencing a chilling effect at work. One person said there was “a culture of silence” around expressing their views on Israel-Palestine, and another said they felt “shame” at working within the U.S. government at this moment.

Some State Department staffers place particular blame for the bubbling discontent on Blinken’s deputy chief of staff for policy.

Tom Sullivan ― a powerful figure who is the brother of Biden’s top national security adviser, Jake Sullivan ― has “consistently overruled” the idea of greater outreach from the secretary to State Department personnel, one official said.

In high-level meetings, Tom Sullivan usually focuses on asking what Israel wants or highlighting its needs ― upsetting colleagues who feel the priority in crafting a plan for support should be on U.S. interests, a U.S. official told HuffPost.

Staffers do not feel comfortable challenging Sullivan because of his brother’s rank, the official continued.

On Thursday evening, Blinken sent out an all-staff message reviewing State Department contributions to his trip. HuffPost obtained the note.

“We asked a lot of you. And once again, under tremendous pressure, you delivered,” the secretary wrote. “I know that, for many of you, this time has not only been challenging professionally, but personally ... You are not alone. We are here for you.”

“Let us also be sure to sustain and expand the space for debate and dissent that makes our policies and our institution better,” the message continued.

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.