隴山隴西郡

寧靜純我心 感得事物人 寫樸實清新. 閑書閑話養閑心,閑筆閑寫記閑人;人生無虞懂珍惜,以沫相濡字字真。
個人資料
  • 博客訪問:
文章分類
歸檔
正文

Everything is terrible and \'I alone can fix it\'

(2016-07-22 13:41:38) 下一個

If you still believe  in superman, you've childish thinking.

Here said: 您對Trump的期望過高了,必然困惑, Trump 不是一位深思熟慮,久經沙場,運籌帷幄的政治家,但他可能是一位反傳統的改革家。(來源: happycow222 ). He is neither 政治家, nor 反傳統的改革家, but opportunist businessman.

Unconventional #42: Where does the GOP go after its ugliest convention since 1964?

Andrew Romano

Presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during the final day of the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio, July 21, 2016. (Photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)

CLEVELAND — When Donald Trump took to the stage of the Quicken Loans Arena to deliver his nomination acceptance speech, he was hoping for a repeat of 1968.

That was the year, of course, thata chip-on-his-shoulder, knife-fighting white man” appealed to the United States’ racially anxious silent majority by promising to restore law and order — and won the White House over an establishment Democrat as a result.

And so, on Thursday night, Trump used his moment in the spotlight to portray the world around us as a terrifying hellscape, with hundreds of thousands of law-breaking illegal immigrants “tonight roaming free to threaten peaceful citizens,” and murder on the rise because of this “administration’s rollback of criminal enforcement.”

“The situation is worse than it has ever been before,” Trump added.

And the only solution, according to Trump, was Trump.

“The attacks on our police, and the terrorism in our cities, threaten our very way of life,” the real estate developer told the tens of millions watching at home. But, he added, “I have a message for all of you: The crime and violence that today afflicts our nation will soon — and I mean very soon — come to an end. Beginning on Jan. 20, 2017, safety will be restored.”

Never mind that the rate of violent crime has fallen by half since 1990. Never mind that only 3 percent of Americans list “crime and violence” as the nation’s most important problem. If it worked for Richard Nixon, why not try it again?

The problem, though, is that — as Mark Twain is reputed to have said — “History doesn’t repeat itself.” Rather, it “rhymes.”

The story of the 2016 election won’t be the story of 1968, no matter how much Trump might want it to be. Trump isn’t Nixon; Hillary Clinton isn’t Hubert Humphrey. History doesn’t repeat itself.

But there were rhymes this week. And thanks to Ted Cruz’s dramatic mutiny Wednesday night — the boos and back-turning it provoked; the division and doubt it exposed — the most revealing was the way Cleveland rhymed with the GOP’s rancorous 1964 convention in San Francisco.

It hasn’t gone unnoticed that Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater was, in some respects, the Trump of his day. He was a Republican insurgent. He was running against the establishment. His views — on the New Deal, on the Cold War — weren’t considered mainstream. He was seen as impulsive, hot-headed, ill-informed — not someone to be trusted with the nuclear codes. The press was hostile. He opposed the Civil Rights Act, and white supremacists were drawn to him.

In the primaries, Goldwater vanquished his main rival, moderate New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller, along with several lesser competitors. But the moderates did not give up. In June, they launched a “Stop Goldwater” movement. They even drafted a candidate: Pennsylvania Gov. William Scranton. And when Scranton’s 11th-hour challenge fizzled, Rockefeller decided to go to San Francisco himself and propose a platform amendment repudiating Goldwater’s extremist followers.

“During this year, I have crisscrossed this nation fighting … to keep the Republican Party of all the people, and warning of the extremist threat,” Rockefeller said from the convention stage. “These things have no place in America.”

The delegates threw paper at the stage. “We want Barry!” they chanted.

“Some of you don’t like to hear it, ladies and gentlemen, but it’s the truth,” Rockefeller said.

“You goddamned Socialist!” cried a young Goldwater supporter.

The booing was so loud, Rockefeller could barely finish his remarks. Historian Rick Perlstein later described the event as the “ugliest of Republican conventions since 1912.” And with the GOP divided — Rockefeller, like Cruz, refused to endorse his party’s nominee — Goldwater went on to lose 44 states on Election Day.

The scene Wednesday night was similar. When Cruz urged listeners to “vote your conscience,” thousands of delegates booed and turned their backs, choosing instead to face Trump, who had materialized on the other side of the Quicken Loans Arena in silent, seething protest.

“Vote for Trump! Vote for Trump!” they shouted. “Go home, Ted!”

And yet a rhyme isn’t a repetition. Trump could win in November, or he may lose in a landslide, with party discord playing a part. But for anyone looking to answer the big post-Cleveland question — Where does the GOP go from here? — it’s worth remembering what happened after Lyndon B. Johnson defeated Goldwater: Conservatism took root. The movement blossomedEventually, Ronald Reagan won the White House and Republicans recaptured Congress after decades in the wilderness.

Was Cruz’s rebellion the last gasp of the old guard? Has movement conservatism lost its grip on the GOP? Is the inward-looking “Americanism” that Trump touted in his address ascendant?

Or is Trump a party of one, without the infrastructure or ideological integrity to sustain the kind of movement that could remake the GOP?   

We’ll know more in a few years’ time. Still, an early clue came Thursday night, in the middle of Trump’s address. He was bemoaning America’s political system — how it permits “the powerful” to “beat up on people that cannot defend themselves;” how it’s “rigged against our citizens.” He claimed to know the system well. And then Trump uttered a telling line:

“I alone can fix it.”

_____

Missed the big speeches? We’ve got you covered.

Donald Trump kisses his daughter Ivanka as he arrives to speak during the final session at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo: Brian Snyder/Reuters)

Holly Bailey on Donald Trump: “In a surreal moment befitting an unconventional candidate at one of the most unusual conventions in recent memory, the arena’s speaker system began playing the Rolling Stones’ ‘You Can’t Always Get What You Want.’ The song is one of Trump’s favorites and a mainstay of his raucous campaign rallies, but it also seemed to be a message from the candidate to a divided party.”

Lisa Belkin on Ivanka Trump: “Her speech tonight was not big on personal anecdote — the few that she did offer included stories of sitting on the floor building towers with Legos while her father sat at a desk designing ones from concrete, or of having her dad exhort to her ‘think big’ — but it was filled with personal reassurance, one mother to millions of others, that her father would represent women in particular.”

Michael Isikoff on Peter Thiel: “Maverick Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel delivered a speech tonight that would have been unheard of at a Republican convention not too many years ago: He proclaimed himself ‘proud to be gay,’ decried ‘fake culture wars’ and called for an end to ‘stupid wars’ in the Middle East.”

Hunter Walker on Joe Arpaio: “Arpaio suggested the cornerstone of Trump’s immigration platform, a massive wall the developer promises to build along the U.S. border with Mexico, would help guard against ‘the dangers of illegal immigration and drugs.’”

_____

Overheard

“It was very interesting — but it was different than ones I’ve been to before.”

A deadpan #RNCinCLE operations volunteer, summing it all up as 10,000 delegates, donors, politicians and journalists streamed out of the Quicken Loans Arena Thursday night.

_____

The RNC wanted to reach out to minorities. Then along came Trump.

California delegate Eddie Inamdar celebrates at the Republican National Convention, July 21, 2016, in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo: Khue Bui for Yahoo News)

By Jon Ward

CLEVELAND — Before RNC Chairman Reince Priebus spoke Thursday night at the Republican convention he had presided over, his young staffers played a video on the big screen that demonstrated what they’d hoped their party would represent this year.

The video was skillfully produced, with slick graphics. It showed young, earnest men and women walking up to homes to knock on doors. There was a young Latino shaking hands with a couple, and an African-American man in a stylish hat telling a voter about the greatness of the Republican Party.

If only.

This year’s convention was as white and as old as ever, and was punctuated by outbursts of resentment against the Black Lives Matter movement and undocumented immigrants. Several speakers stood at the podium nodding and smiling as thousands of delegates chanted, “Lock her up! Lock her up!” in reference to presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

(Read the full story here.)

One year ago, young Republicans looked at Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., or former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, or Ohio Gov. John Kasich, or Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., or New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, and thought, “We’re headed for a young, positive, hopeful campaign.”

A Rubio or Bush nomination, in particular, held the prospect of winning over millions of Latino voters and young voters. It was one of the goals set forth in the 2013 autopsy report that Priebus sanctioned and released from the RNC.

That report laid out the demographic facts — the diminishing percentage of white voters in each consecutive presidential election — and said, “If Hispanic-Americans perceive that a GOP nominee or candidate does not want them in the United States … they will not pay attention to our next sentence.”

“It does not matter what we say about education, jobs or the economy; if Hispanics think we do not want them here, they will close their ears to our policies,” the report said.

One of Priebus’ favorite lines is that Republicans are “the party of the open door.”

On Thursday, Priebus started his speech with that same phrase. And then he ceded the stage to a nominee whose central idea is to build a giant wall.

_____

A tale of two protests

Medea Benjamin of Code Pink is taken away as Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during the final day of the Republican National Convention, July 21, 2016. (Photo: Matt Rourke/AP)

As Trump spoke Thursday night, he was briefly interrupted by veteran Code Pink activist Medea Benjamin, who began shouting and waving a banner that read “Build Bridges Not Walls.” Yahoo News National Correspondent Hunter Walker caught up with Benjamin after security dragged her out of the arena:

Benjamin and other members of Code Pink plan to travel to Philadelphia to protest next week’s Democratic convention. She said they get inside the conventions because the party activists and delegates in attendance “just give us their badges.”

“There are a lot of Republicans who don’t like Donald Trump. I mean, we’ve been out on the streets all these days, and we’ve just seen so many people who come up and say — you know, they agree with us that Donald Trump is not fit to be president,” Benjamin said. “There seemed like a lot of enthusiasm tonight, but from what I’ve seen, there’s a tremendous crisis in this party, and I think it’s going to be a very difficult electoral season for them.”

After protesting at so many major events, Benjamin has become fairly well-known. She was “amazed” security didn’t notice her infiltrating the RNC. “There was a congressman there who came up and said hello,” Benjamin said.

“There were people who winked at me. I’m sure there were people who recognized me, but thankfully they didn’t say anything. I was indeed nervous the whole time that somebody was going to come and pull me out because I had been recognized.”

Benjamin wasn’t sure which lawmaker she saw, but she said he was wearing a congressional lapel pin. She spent about two hours waiting on the convention floor for Trump’s speech, and said she was “very nervous the entire time.”

“It’s scary. I mean, you look out and you see a sea of people who are so enthusiastic and cheering, and you know that the people around you are going to be really upset with you. It is scary,” Benjamin said.

Meanwhile, outside the Q, Yahoo News’ Chris Wilson wandered among the protestors gathered in Public Square:

Here, for this night at least, there was no fear on display, no violence — and no arrests.

There were some gun-rights supporters carrying long guns and pistols, but they were outnumbered by people lounging in the grass with their dogs, and in one case, a pet lizard. There were also a few men in Guy Fawkes masks, and flag-waving Trump supporters in “Hillary for Prison” shirts, but their exchanges with the anti-Trump demonstrators never got beyond the occasional taunting shout or intense but mostly cordial political argument.

~~ /`~~~

陳文茜一語道破「全球化發瘋現象」:感謝川普先生 (圖)

 
 
 
來源: 2016-07-11 17:29:26 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 1690 次 (9107 bytes)
陳文茜:感謝川普先生



口出穢言、仇外的政治人物不隻出現在美國,「全球化發瘋現象」早就上演投機政客的掠奪,這不是單一國家特產,是不信任年代下的特產。

直到川普先生出現,我們才真正承認這個世界有一大部份的人,「瘋了」。

川普先生是個不折不扣的「美國土豪」,其行徑直逼當年的「蓋茨比」,炫富、吹牛、不害臊。他破產了四次,但沒有一回是完全真的。和許多「破產富豪」一般,他每回總是先私藏好一筆錢,然後銀行、債權人扣押不了他的財產,接著宣布破產。沒多久,東山再起。

他的行徑不完全是富豪,更像個騙子,但他是一名上流社會的高明騙子。於是二○○八年金融海嘯後,在生存中掙紮的美國中下階層,或者收入消失中的中產階級愛上了他;川普先生的粗話,代替他們發洩對時代、對體製、尤其對華爾街金童的憤怒。「不要告訴我川普騙了銀行;因為尋常百姓隻有被理專、銀行騙的份,他居然可以騙銀行,還騙了四次。英雄!了不起!」

是的,粗鄙、罵女記者月經不順;打破美國民主傳統不允許組織網軍的川普,一切行為皆被容忍;因為英雄有各種免責權。英雄以一種獨特的模式征服了脆弱的心靈,所以他的一切行徑,不必遵守凡人的道德,甚至法律。愈狂妄,愈舒爽;愈誇大,愈過癮。

在美國為小人物找路

美國社會至少有一大批川普迷,不是認同他的粗魯及法西斯歧視主義,而是民眾們自己有恨、滿懷無奈,他們需要出口,需要一場徹底的破壞,一輪淋漓盡致的顛複。

於是「去他的教養」,他們決定擁戴一個半瘋半假的非典型人物,一舉打垮美國這個看似體麵其實汙穢的體製;衣冠楚楚的華府那端,每個人骨子內皆充滿了無恥謊言。

美國一名卡車司機開了十二小時的車來到川普造勢現場,他在北卡是個好父親、甚至好丈夫。記者訪問他熱愛川普的理由,他的口氣一點也不狂妄,有一定教養,而且衣著乾淨。

答案很簡單,他不信任現在檯麵上的政治人物,在他眼中,檯麵上的他或她全是華爾街的共犯;他相信隻有「聰明的」川普,可以把「美國夢」找回來。

無論美國的左派或右派、保守派或自由派,都對「川普現象」傻眼。「川普是個大富豪,他代表白人藍領?」以思想保守主義旗幟鮮明的刊物《國家評論》,把川普形容為「自卡利古拉(Caligula,羅馬帝國早期的典型暴君)以來最沒品味的滑稽小醜」。是的,人可以支持保守主義,但至少那個人該屬於「高尚質量」的社會群體之一。這個噁心人等,居然代表共和黨。天啊!等同判處共和黨死刑。

關於川普現象的討論在美國正熱絡著;我不再多加敘述。但若拉開美國本位主義的框窗,「川普們」早已在世界各地有了分身。

他(她)們或許沒有川普的魅力、沒有他的喜感、沒有他的低俗、沒有他的糟糕髮型、沒有他胡說八道的本領,但是抓住人們「需要一種完全不同的政治」,繼而利用民眾的直覺,幻化成不可執行的「民粹主義」,甚至經濟學教授以其「知識」包裝荒唐的國際經濟主張(希臘、西班牙、法國),奪取中央或地方政權。這種現象過去五年早已在大西洋、太平洋兩岸全麵上演。

「川普」不是原因,而是結果。「川普」更不是唯一。

差別隻是他居然出現在美國,不是國債倒閉的希臘、西班牙,不是備受恐攻威脅的法國、比利時,不是恐懼俄羅斯擴張的波蘭、匈牙利,不是民主機製不成熟的第三世界社會。

川普現象居然出現在美國,這震驚了美國社會。一個諷刺現象,川普先生就住在離自由女神五十幾條街之外,他寬闊一望無際的客廳落地窗,往東可以穿透中央公園、往西可以望向布魯克林大橋、自由女神。

但川普先生的解釋是:「自由」女神隻屬於美國白人,非穆斯林,尤其必須貌美、月經順暢,而且沒有墮過胎的女性。

川普站在辯論台上對許多事情的說詞,都是那種「幾句話就讓對手一槍斃命」式的語言。那些大談外交政策、全球化生產鏈、全球單一市場佈局棋盤的對手,知識包袱愈多的人,在他身旁顯得愈笨。

在選舉政治上有句名言:「如果你必須解釋,你就輸了。」於是簡單而容易理解的口號,簡化甚至涉及欺騙的懶人主張,大聲且有力地貫穿全美國。

儘管在過去的曆史,政治口號事後想起來令人不齒;但往往在當下,可以創造黑暗中曙光的幻覺。它們嗬護著人們在金融海嘯後的沮喪,為世間浮沉中充滿無力感的小人物找到出路。

這不隻是一個「不信任」的年代,更是「呐喊」的時代;於是自二○一一年起,全球的呐喊抗爭佔領一個接一個,我們在其中看到小人物的眼淚,年輕人的茫然,體製不被信賴後的崩解,傳統政治菁英的狼狽,以及:投機政客的掠奪。

人在經濟大衰退後,最本能的本性會發展成極端主義或國族主義的「舊政治」,這似乎是自一九二九年經濟大蕭條至今,永恆不變的真理。

是的,我們已走上了「人工智慧」的時代,但隻要人性不變,時代現象雷同,人就未必有超越過往的智慧。

好吧!為什麽我要感謝川普先生?

因為過去五年,由於「川普們」的瘋狂現象發生地不在美國,那些瘋狂者並非登場於「民主典範」(至少內政)的國家;人們對於這個「全球化發瘋現象」並未給予足夠的重視,甚至依據各地狀況,給予支離破碎的答案。

在全球共享民粹主義

希臘,民主傳統不穩固、人太懶、國債太高,所以所以……;

西班牙的加泰隆尼亞早有他們的「天然獨」、高第之城有其特殊文明及曆史傳統語言,所以所以……;

西班牙「我們的黨」崛起、因為年輕人失業率高達近五○%,所以所以……;

法國極右派「國家陣線」崛起、當地穆斯林人口佔一○%、未來歐洲可能穆斯林化,所以所以……;

波蘭,即使前執政黨政績良好,但俄羅斯普丁佔領克裏米亞強勢作為,再度喚起昔日蘇聯共產高壓統治的記憶,所以所以……;

台灣,太陽花運動、馬英九太親北京、服貿談判黑箱作業、親中賣台,所以所以……;

而阿拉伯之春,穆斯林們終於響應「民主價值」,年輕人勇敢以臉書大串聯推翻獨裁近四十年的強者,不幸的是接而上演的是當地千年宗派之爭以及極端主義崛起,所以所以……。

直到川普先生出現,歐美許多政治或經濟學者才恍然大悟:「沒有一個東西或現象是特產。」它們看似是各種錯綜複雜因素結合而成的政治變遷,其實沒有一個是特產。川普不是,法國的極右派馬琳.勒龐也不是。

川普隻是「悟性」比別人高一點,更順勢而為。

於是一個汙言穢語、億萬富翁、紐約及賭城房地產開發商,變成了美國窮人或「魯蛇」(Loser) 的代言者。他高舉經濟的保護主義(主要對象為中國、墨西哥、日本),憤怒仇外的民族主義(反穆斯林、反移民),威權主義(組織網軍攻擊特定電視台及主持人和評論者)……,這些在我以上列舉的國家及社會,哪一個沒有類似現象?

這是一場全球性的「共享民粹主義」。川普和其他國家領袖的差別是,他居然出現在自我感覺良好的美國,而且更精於表演,更敢言,更直接,也相較更「聰明」。

想長篇大論反駁嗎?Sorry, You’re Fired.

~~~/ !!!

共和黨策略師總結川普演講必殺技:已超越誇誇其談(圖)

文章來源: - 新聞取自各大新聞媒體,新聞內容並不代表本網立場!
打印本新聞 (被閱讀 1778 次)
 

有沒有人覺得,唐納德??·川普(Donald J. Trump)在喪失理智?他的演講一向以漫無目的、東拉西扯為特色,但最近的幾場演講就如共和黨政治策略師邁克·墨菲(Mike Murphy)所言,已經超出了誇誇其談的範疇,根本就是「醉醺醺的祝酒詞」。

川普的語言特色一直都很鮮明。他其實不太成句或成段地說話。他在演講中常常突然一下撂出五六個詞,它們之間的關聯隻能借助混沌理論來理解:「They want the wall(他們要牆)……I dominated with the evangelicals(我在福音派占優)……I won in a landslide(我壓倒性獲勝)……We can't be the stupid people anymore(我們再也不能當蠢人了)

偶爾,川普會試著說出長度超過八個單詞的句子,但不論句子開頭的主題是什麽,他最終都會把主題變成他自己。以他宣布選中邁克·彭斯(Mike Pence)作為競選搭檔為例:「因此我選擇邁克的主要理由是我看重印第安納州,而且我在印第安納州大獲全勝。」每當他試著說出一個包含多重意思的想法時,某種無法抗拒的自戀就會占據上風,影響他的言辭。

川普還是一台以受傷的自尊為燃料的小小發動機。例如,麥凱·科潘斯(McKay Coppins)在BuzzFeed網站上回憶說,由於他的那篇川普特稿不太正麵(他說馬阿拉歌莊園[Mar-a-Lago]是一家不錯的酒店,盡管有點過時),川普便奉上了一大串惡言惡語。

川普非常憤怒,每天都要在奇怪的時間發好幾條推文報複科潘斯,說他是「不誠實的懶蟲」和「真正的垃圾,沒有信譽可言」。這樣的攻擊整整持續了兩年,讓人肅然起敬,這樣的程度足以讓科潘斯躋身唐納德·川普(Donald Trump)深惡痛絕的前10萬個人之列。

過去幾個星期裏,川普長期以來的這些語言特色得到了更加淋漓盡致的體現。這是美國政治史上獨一無二的時刻:一個主要政黨的提名人是否有穩定的精神狀態竟然成了街談巷議的話題。

所有人都在說川普應該降低火力,變得更冷靜一些,但是在本月於辛辛那提州附近舉行的一場集會活動,以及上周六宣布彭斯為其競選搭檔的演講中,川普再度發射了言辭火箭,它直接射穿雲層,落到了黛比行星(Planet Debbie)的某個黑暗角落。

川普宣布彭斯為競選搭檔的活動,真的是美國近代政治史上最奇怪的一次揭曉副總統人選的儀式。川普跑題大放厥詞的時間是他介紹彭斯的時間的兩倍都不止。連彭斯恭維他的時候,他都拒絕留在台上,用讚賞的眼光專注地看著對方。那場麵就像是看一個新郎在新娘上場時對婚禮喪失了興趣。

他的思維漫遊的路線似乎也發生了變化。就像我前麵講過的,以前他的演講一向漫無目的、東拉西扯。但是在上周六,他的演講有著一條清晰的直線,固定於他的競選團隊之前寫在紙上的幾個談話要點。但是,川普無法將注意力保持在這條直線上——因為這個話題是有關別人的——所以大約每隔30秒,他就會拋出一段充滿憤慨情緒的誇誇其談。

如果必須畫一張記錄川普言論的草圖,它大概是這個樣子:彭斯……我在伊拉克問題上的看法是對的……彭斯……希拉蕊·柯林頓(Hillary Clinton)是個奸詐的騙子……彭斯……我在「脫歐」問題上的看法是對的……彭斯……希拉蕊·柯林頓滿嘴謊言……我們會讓煤炭業重新發展起來……基督徒喜歡我……彭斯……我講話是有統計依據的……彭斯長得不錯……我在華盛頓的酒店真的越來越棒……彭斯。

唐納德·川普處在自己最成功的時刻,但他看起來似乎比過去任何時候都更加充滿憤恨,更身陷重圍。政黨大??會大多是場麵愉快的加冕禮,但這次的場麵會讓人感覺像是飽含怨憤的阿拉莫反擊戰。

很難搞清楚那個人的腦子裏到底在想什麽,不過科學研究為我們提供了一個線索。心理學家在考慮,孤芳自賞者可否被看作是極力掩飾自己極端的自負或自卑。目前的共識似乎是,自我感知不穩定是這類人的一大特征。他們的自信心很強,同時又非常脆弱,所以他們會時時處處感受到對自己自尊的威脅。

或許,隨著川普獲得更大的成功,他對自己值得擁有何種程度的尊崇的評估有所提高,但外界對他的批評也越來強烈。二者結合,勢必讓他的自尊威脅感應器持續處在強感應狀態。所以即便候選人川普被告誡要發表正常的政治言論,但內裏的男孩川普還是會搶過麥克風,再次發出充滿怨憤情緒的吹噓。

突然之前,國際局勢開始有利於川普當選總統候選人。某些形式的混亂——比如一場金融危機——會讓選民支持頭腦冷靜而不失靈活的思考者。但其他形式的混亂——街頭流血事件——則令他們急忙轉向殘暴的鐵腕人物。

如果繼續發生連串的恐怖事件,川普可能會贏得總統職位。盡管他對自己的掌控度越來越低,但他會贏得大選。
[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (3)
評論
TJKCB 回複 悄悄話 A real leader leads to make tons of money, freely giving anyone. Damn - he's a poor little guy.

? 扶清滅洋,減稅排外,川普粗陋搭接共和黨傳統政策,像極了義和團與慈禧太後的聯盟 - easycity - ♂ (3258 bytes) (47 reads) 07/23/2016 13:40:18

? 支持川普的華人呢,說話沒有邏輯的,像一切為了生存不計其他的楊秀清。 - easycity - ♂ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 07/23/2016 13:43:59
? 支持川普的華人,說話非常有邏輯的,就好象被大學種族照顧和第三性別廁所惹的發毛了的石達開。 - easycity - ♂ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 07/23/2016 13:44:46
? 川普的國策是符合中產階級利益的, 外交戰略收縮, 美國利益優先,不強行輸出西方價值觀,強調內政建設等 - zd3y - ♂ (260 bytes) (3 reads) 07/23/2016 13:56:09
? 黑社會山大王保護費:共和黨總統候選人川普稱,如果北約盟國沒有盡責、交夠錢,那麽他當選總統後可能不會再無條件保護北約盟... - TJKCB - ♀ (191 bytes) (1 reads) 07/23/2016 14:00:20
TJKCB 回複 悄悄話
? 扶清滅洋,減稅排外,川普粗陋搭接共和黨傳統政策,像極了義和團與慈禧太後的聯盟 - easycity - ♂ (3258 bytes) (47 reads) 07/23/2016 13:40:18

? 支持川普的華人呢,說話沒有邏輯的,像一切為了生存不計其他的楊秀清。 - easycity - ♂ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 07/23/2016 13:43:59
? 支持川普的華人,說話非常有邏輯的,就好象被大學種族照顧和第三性別廁所惹的發毛了的石達開。 - easycity - ♂ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 07/23/2016 13:44:46
? 川普的國策是符合中產階級利益的, 外交戰略收縮, 美國利益優先,不強行輸出西方價值觀,強調內政建設等 - zd3y - ♂ (260 bytes) (3 reads) 07/23/2016 13:56:09
? 黑社會山大王保護費:共和黨總統候選人川普稱,如果北約盟國沒有盡責、交夠錢,那麽他當選總統後可能不會再無條件保護北約盟... - TJKCB - ♀ (191 bytes) (1 reads) 07/23/2016 14:00:20
TJKCB 回複 悄悄話 你沒明白川普的口頭承諾背後沒有計劃打算做支撐,實施不了的東西怎麽可信 來源: xioduo 於 2016-07-22
川普以全體穆斯林為敵,隻會把更多人推向極端穆斯林,加劇恐襲 - 非否 - ♀ 給 非否 發送悄悄話 非否 的博客首頁 非否 的個人群組 (0 bytes) (9 reads) 07/22/2016 15:30:03
登錄後才可評論.