白宮正式回複請願：ABC所播言論不代表美國主流管點

白宮的回複讓人不爽。大意是 “ABC廣播的“殺華”言論不代表美國主流管點。ABC有言論自由，受憲法第一修正案保護。” 白宮沒有譴責殺人的言論，沒有說反對宣傳暴力。立場很有問題。

白宮回複的最後有鏈接可接受民眾的反饋。


What We Have to Say About Jimmy Kimmel

Thank you for your petition. Your petition requested an apology from those involved, and to "cut the show."

The parties involved have already apologized independently. Jimmy Kimmel has apologized on-air, and issued a written apology. ABC has removed the skit from future broadcasts, taken the clip down from online platforms, and detailed several changes in its programming review process in response to this incident. You can find more about Jimmy Kimmel's apology here, and ABC's apology here.

On a broader level, as the President has stated publicly, the United States welcomes the continuing peaceful rise of China. The comments you are writing about do not reflect mainstream views of China in the United States. 

The Federal government cannot force ABC to remove this show. The First Amendment of the Constitution protects free speech, even if individuals might personally find it offensive or distasteful. It may be upsetting when people say things we might personally disagree with, but the principle of protected free speech is an important part of who we are as a nation.

If you think this issue merits additional scrutiny, you may file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission by visiting FCC.gov/Complaints. The FCC is an independent agency that regulates the airwaves without input or consideration from the White House.

Tell us what you think about this petition response and We the People.

[無知無為]

美國人連總統、連耶穌也該殺，蠢民們不要為小屁孩的一句屁話而動了肝火，實在不值得。這可以解讀為恥感文化的一種義氣顯現，個人沒有義務為其他人或整個族人負責。在美國就學一點美國人的哲學。

[路過路人]

中國都不好好抗議，唉，無語。。。

[武勝]

官僚式的回應。大都是程式性內容，唯有第二段"歡迎中國和平崛起"算是表達觀點，卻又毫不切題。

[非否非]

“殺光中國人”，怎能與“殺光猶太人”同日而語？

[康無為]

”individuals might personally find it offensive“ 意思就是這不是你們所說的種族問題，隻是個人感受而已。老美的辭令啊。

[一管之見]

我覺得白宮的表態也沒怎麽帶偏見。美國政府須按憲法行事，不象中國政府的權那麽大。ABC出麵道歉，表示將采取措施避免類似事件再度發生，這也交代得過去了。

[gongping900]

我覺得WH的RESPONSE很得體。 如果還不滿意，那你就需走司法途徑。 當年尼可鬆說 NEW YORK TIMES 的報道泄漏了他的國家機密，很生氣，但也隻能去法院打官司。 最後，美國最高法院也是以言論自由受憲法保護為依據判總統尼可鬆敗訴。

這就是美國. 他們的憲法不是一張廢紙.

[YukongZhao]

白宮應該譴責這種言論才為妥當。

[唵啊吽]

選舉要拒絕投票民主黨人的票，那些在雞毛秀事件中站出來為華裔說話的除外。

[唵啊吽]

說“ABC不代表美國主流觀點”和問題不相關。不是觀點問題，是政治上不正確的問題。言論自由，誰有什麽觀點都可以，就是不可以挑戰人類良心底線。

[唵啊吽]

媒體是天然壟斷行業，美國幾大媒體是寡頭市場，就這麽兩三家大媒體占領了美國99%的觀眾。說“ABC不代表美國主流媒體”不符合美國實際現狀。