::::::Word of the Day

ddddd


炁


v

[z.f.]

zz: "haha......you can't win!!"

如果語言用來被推理輸贏...輸與贏的GAME沒有意思...

可每一句話裏不隻那些"死"意思,還有"活"意思...

"but let's kill it now!"

同意! :)

[作舟]

to remember five names among 1000000 artists is not rational......

saying "那些 'art'-ists 擺出來的, "證據確鑿" is.....

"我充滿活力的MIND"....these words are dangerous....

haha......you can't win!!

:))

but let's kill it now!

[z.f.]

"那些 'art'-ists 擺出來的, "證據確鑿"...:)

如果你和我一樣“看”到，認同，我們的談話才會更有意思。。。

"can you name five living artists who do that?"

你留給我的"作業", 我不做...:)))

[z.f.]

"u killed the conversation....:))"

我沒有, 是你。。。 “u killed the conversation....:))”

我才真正談到了神秘...而你偏要用你的RATIONAL MIND來“UPDATE”我充滿活力的MIND...:)))

[作舟]

it is you who said "那些 'art'-ists 擺出來的, "證據確鑿"...:)


......

u killed the conversation....:))

[z.f.]

哈哈, 我的[ ]腦拒絕任何"係統工程"...:))

[作舟]

see, you can't even name five living artists who can provide us with 確鑿證據......

well, your [ ]腦 needs a update......


:))

[z.f.]

"i need 確鑿證據......"


:))

我的"證據確鑿"是引號...你, 你, 你, 你到底是個什麽[ ]腦?

:))

[z.f.]

如果認識一個人的畫或者詩或者文字, 不用知其"名", 不用知道其後天的"氣"的熏陶, 你就知道那是他/她的東西, 我想那或許就是炁的無形的"呈現"...

大多數人追逐的名氣,或跟著那些名氣轉轉悠悠, 被人忽悠, 或者去忽悠他人...非常莫名其妙...

FINE ARTISTS的藝術作品中的炁很明顯, 一直都在那裏, 可以"看"到...而每個人每個人也都在展現, 可是如何說呢?

[作舟]

i need 確鑿證據......


:))

[作舟]

can you name five living artists who do that?

:))

[z.f.]

"do all humans reveal that?"

OF　ＣＯＵＲＳＥ．．．:)

但是那些 'art'-ists 擺出來的, "證據確鑿"...:)

站在一個點上說話的時候,沒有說ONLY的意思... :(

[作舟]

only confined to 'art'-ists?

do all humans reveal that?

[影雲]

這個字本身就很美！ 非常視覺

[z.f.]

對於先天的這種神秘的炁，其實在許多FINE ARTISTS的藝術作品中有“很明顯”的體現。。。很難逃掉。。。:)