2016 (368)
2017 (123)
2018 (89)
2020 (269)
設立三八設立性侵節
一劍飄塵
100年前，爭取女權，是勇士。50年 前反性別歧視，是正義。今天還他媽meToo的，不是變態就是變性了！看起來性侵女性的是男人，實際上是權勢！無權無勢的男人，有女人會給他們足以性侵的機會嗎?
最近美國一女教師利用老師職務，性侵13歲男學生。所以性侵這個東西，並非男人專利，而是權勢的專利。男人分泌荷爾蒙，產生性交欲望，是自然現象。比女人買包包欲望還要自然。違背女性意願的性行為，絕大多數國家的法律會嚴懲。性侵時，不去報案。過了幾十年，證據都灰飛煙滅了，才搞街頭運動。個個張牙舞爪，都是一麵之詞！法律的公正性又何在？我看那幫走在街頭的八婆，沒有一個能勾起男人欲望的。小人之心一下：這幫超級女權主義者，並非因為被性侵而走上街頭，而是自己不再勾起男人的欲望而歇斯底裏。
如果說女權是被大男子主義逼出來的，超級女權就是被大女子主義誘惑出來的。你不能既要男女平等，還要一個女人才有的三八節。你不能既要男女平等，還要男人處處照顧女人！男人必須紳士，女人是不是也應該淑女呢？權利和便利都是女人的，男人就應該做奴隸？！真正的男女平等，是應該根本不考慮性別！按能力工作，按先後排隊。而不是這個要照顧一下女性，那個要禮貌一下女性。該競爭，別要男人謙讓。該出錢，女性不要縮手縮腳！
超級女權顯然也知道，這樣的話，女性自古以來獲得的一些特權，就會煙消雲散。所以她們追求的，我覺得更多是她們自己的表現欲和領導欲。但是這些超級垃圾卻綁架了整個女性群體，讓男性敢怒不敢言。
真不應該有三八婦女節，隻能有三八性侵節：本年度性侵公審截止日，過期不候！有冤報冤有仇報仇，性侵者割雞雞，誣告者割舌頭。別特麽二十年後再哭訴：meToo。你能把二十年前性侵你的精液吐出來，你再too！
20190308
How do you define level playing field? Trade or transaction happens only when two parties have distinct needs and advantages, which by definition puts them on un-level playing field. So long as there is no invasion (involuntary violation) of private property, which includes one's own body, the transaction is voluntary, it is legitimate. You are telling the likes of Gwyneth Paltrow, Nicole Kidman, etc, etc, were powerless when they proclaimed Harvey Weinstein God and thanked him profusely on Oscar stage and everywhere else? They were stars, even if some of them were not mega stars before, already. You are telling me just because they had not yet obtained one more award, and needed to kiss up to Harvey Weinstein, they are powerless? Then you are always powerless when you desire is endless. The actresses are just shamelessly promoting themselves by whatever means possible. They are only using the tale of victimhood to garner people's sympathy to advance their careers. When the transaction with Harvey is advantageous, they use Harvey. When it is profitable to play the political game of victimhood, they are act the part perfectly. After all, they are actresses, professionals of emotional manipulation. Don't be so naive.
_____________
nightrider 發表評論於 2019-03-09 12:27:39
Could not have said better. The best example is the affair with Harvey Weinstein. All those female "victims" had all the power to walk away....
保守派川粉價值觀，男女混廁是傷風敗俗亂人倫，當女士真的身體受辱時被男人侮辱強奸時則應怪罪女士在男人跟前表現還不夠奴隸還不夠順從。
----男人也會被性侵的，隻要是真的被傷害，而不是扭捏作態，事後訛詐。
MAGA