回複:You did not understand what I was telling you

來源: 交流-2 2013-06-07 18:40:22 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (710 bytes)
I see your point. The reason I mention those stuff is that without those, I have no reason to ask them leave. without those stuff i welcome them to stay. But I heard the court is quite protective to tenants. get an eviction order need reasons. before all those stuff, we were in good relationship. 

I just thought that my tenant said no pressfor charges. what they can charge for? my tenants don't have neough evidence to press charges. they can speculate. but the guy did not do anything and left before the police came. my tenants can claim they are victims. i wonder if the mngt has enough reason to evict them? 

in any case, I appreciate your help.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”