that is your statements, not necessarily facts.

來源: pediatrician2 2012-12-19 11:35:33 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (152 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ pediatrician2 ] 在 2012-12-19 14:17:35 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
回答: well said...noconfusion2012-12-19 11:32:32

does your conclusion come from rigrous research? give me break. you are boasting here others are chicken heads. shame on you.

 

所有跟帖: 

ask my friend google -noconfusion- 給 noconfusion 發送悄悄話 noconfusion 的博客首頁 (163 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 11:39:07

i do not even bother wasting time on your fact. -pediatrician2- 給 pediatrician2 發送悄悄話 pediatrician2 的博客首頁 (87 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 11:50:47

what rigorous? -noconfusion- 給 noconfusion 發送悄悄話 noconfusion 的博客首頁 (411 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 12:02:58

what rigorous? -noconfusion- 給 noconfusion 發送悄悄話 noconfusion 的博客首頁 (411 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 12:03:01

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”