that is your statements, not necessarily facts.

來源: pediatrician2 於 2012-12-19 11:35:33 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (152 bytes)
本帖於 2012-12-19 14:17:35 時間, 由普通用戶 jy101 編輯
回答: well said... 由 noconfusion 於 2012-12-19 11:32:32

does your conclusion come from rigrous research? give me break. you are boasting here others are chicken heads. shame on you.

 

所有跟帖： 

• ask my friend google -noconfusion- ♂ 給 noconfusion 發送悄悄話 noconfusion 的博客首頁 (163 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 11:39:07

• i do not even bother wasting time on your fact. -pediatrician2- ♂ 給 pediatrician2 發送悄悄話 pediatrician2 的博客首頁 (87 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 11:50:47

• what rigorous? -noconfusion- ♂ 給 noconfusion 發送悄悄話 noconfusion 的博客首頁 (411 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 12:02:58

• what rigorous? -noconfusion- ♂ 給 noconfusion 發送悄悄話 noconfusion 的博客首頁 (411 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 12:03:01

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！