the gun debate explains why people lose money

knee jerk reactions to a single event.... not looking at statistical facts.

and this is the way most people deal with market events... without looking at statistical facts.

no wonder people lose money.

所有跟帖： 

• 有槍並不能阻止康州的事。但有槍能阻止入室搶劫。當一個社區大多數人都有槍的話，大大增加了搶劫的成本。 -sweetptt- ♂ (107 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 09:51:25

• 老美家有槍的很多，老中家少，家壇人說，是因為怕花錢，因為 -jessefan- ♀ (25 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 09:59:29

• 那是。哈哈。以前有個朋友跟我說EB-5是他娘的什麽東西，我出錢投資沒有收益還要付幾萬手續費。 -sweetptt- ♂ (133 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 10:08:05

• haha,not bad. -Morning3evening4- ♂ (481 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 10:30:56

• good, let's look at stats -noconfusion- ♂ (71 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 10:49:10

• Did the tighter control results in any difficulty for criminals -Morning3evening4- ♂ (248 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 10:56:47

• you are still doing 'fundamental analysis'.. -noconfusion- ♂ (27 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 11:08:39

• I thought FA is necessary for investment.:). -Morning3evening4- ♂ (145 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 12:34:54