Introduction to US Proverty 101

來源: borisg 2012-11-09 19:13:34 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2273 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ borisg ] 在 2012-11-09 19:56:01 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

Most of us Chinese here have limited exposure to the poor in the US and the various public assistance programs. Without a good overall picture, you are easily influenced by a few words you pick up here or there and form wrong opinions. Let's take a quick look at some facts.

1. What is poverty? By the government definition:

Income per month: 1 person: $920; 4 person: $1950

Now try to figure out how to squeeze a living with that amount. Don't scream. According to statistics, over 50% American adults spent some time under that line.

2. Various low income groups and federal sources (item with *: estimated benefits and number of people):

a. Retirees: average amount received from SSI: $1200/m. Total recepients: 60m(individuals here as well as following except denoted as households or families).

b. Unemployment Benefit: average amount: $1500/m. Total recepients: 6m.

c. Disability: average amount: $1063/m. Total recepients: 8m.

d. Food stamp: anybody with income level under the proverty line and no more than a few thousand dollar's worth (including such people in a to c) can receive an amount based on the income. Average amount: $140/month/person. Total recepients: 40m.

e. HUD Sec. 8: average: $600/m. Total household: 4m.

f. State welfare:(temporary assistance with time limitations, but those people always find ways to get back). Average: $600/m single person, $1000/m family. Total: 10m.(*)

g. Temporary assistance from charity organizations: single payment toward 1st month rent. Average: $600. Total: 1m (*)

h. Utility assistance: Average: $100/m. Total: 2m (*)

After you have read through my list, you probably are aghast at how small a percentage that actually work here and pay up to all these expenses.

It is not difficult for a couple with a couple of kids to get 3k from government programs. They don't live well-off in any sense, but think that they don't pay taxes, they don't put into retirement, they don't pay medical bills, and they don't pay kid's lunch money. This means if they use this money judiciously they are not worse off than some people making 40-50k.

In this post I just lay out the facts. I will find another opportunity to voice my opinion.

所有跟帖: 

謝謝提供事實。 -小心翼翼的小地主- 給 小心翼翼的小地主 發送悄悄話 小心翼翼的小地主 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 19:23:23

你的數據很不錯.. -sisbio- 給 sisbio 發送悄悄話 (345 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 19:23:39

good data and good factors. -SunshineInCA- 給 SunshineInCA 發送悄悄話 (28 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 19:39:46

可以提供數據來源嗎? -臨時上網- 給 臨時上網 發送悄悄話 (122 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 21:13:59

您說的是SSI,不是SS retirement. 領SSI的人數少得多。 -borisg- 給 borisg 發送悄悄話 borisg 的博客首頁 (256 bytes) () 11/10/2012 postreply 03:23:07

我寫錯了。 -borisg- 給 borisg 發送悄悄話 borisg 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/10/2012 postreply 06:29:31

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”