My thought is real estate has small impact.

The population is still going up, and people will have to live under a roof. Even boomers down-sizing, the new generations will take over. As long as the cost for man-power keep the same or up, no big deal for real estate.

The liquidation of real estate is not as easy as stock. Therefore, for most boomer, the 1st choice should be stock to trade cash.

所有跟帖： 

• The concern is their kids will inherit instead of purchase -古石- ♂ (390 bytes) () 06/06/2012 postreply 09:52:49

• Retired people may migrate to cheap areas. -Morning3evening4- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/06/2012 postreply 09:54:48

• 然後他們從較便宜的地方走了後，那個地方會怎樣？ -古石- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/06/2012 postreply 11:13:26

• If the population keeps up, should be no problem. -Morning3evening4- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/06/2012 postreply 11:15:22

• 號？"if" may not be that easy in those areas. -古石- ♂ (70 bytes) () 06/06/2012 postreply 11:24:53

• 你投資房不會買這種地方的。：）。 -Morning3evening4- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/06/2012 postreply 11:26:06

• kids will inherit -- 可能性很小。通常是父母賣了房搬到孩子附近的小房或租房 -螺絲螺帽- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/06/2012 postreply 10:15:00

• 也就是說他們會拋售。而且價格上也不很挑剔。 -古石- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/06/2012 postreply 11:15:50