That kind of business model is: winer takes all.

For every niche, there would be only 1 winer makes money, 1 survivor hanging above break even line, 1 slightly below water wishfully thinking... everybody's else dead already. You have to run for the speed first.

Each story can't last long either, like the Groupon / Living Social, WebEx / GoToMeeting, My Space / FB / Monster...

Good thing about segmented business, like landlord here as a good example, it's easier for people to start and last longer. 小而碎也有好處，大鱷也不容易整合。要是沒有那實力，就不能處於四戰之地。

所有跟帖： 

• 有道理 -08明前茶- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 13:19:26

• Ding -向大洋- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 13:51:24

• It's not necessary -如川- ♀ (334 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 13:51:41

• It market is accessible universally. Different from fast food. -向大洋- ♂ (80 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 14:00:51

• I meant "IT" market, not "It market"... -向大洋- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 14:07:27

• Every market has the potential -如川- ♀ (266 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 14:29:46

• agree! even in the traditional business like cosmetic products -jessefan- ♀ (169 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 14:17:09