讀書人看上法庭：上法庭就如寫學術文章。

來源: sweetptt 於 2012-05-22 12:33:39 [檔案] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀：次 (6029 bytes)

本文內容已被 [ sweetptt ] 在 2012-05-22 14:46:37 編輯過。如有問題，請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

第一，你要有一個很強的立論。上過幾次法庭。聽到很多地主夾雜不清，雞毛蒜皮的東西都要滔滔不絕。庭審分搬不搬和賠不賠兩堂。我一般隻說今天的問題。比如搬不搬的時候有房客提出搬入時沒有冰箱，我知道這是謊言，但我一言不發。法官問我還有什麽問題，我說沒有了。因為那天隻決定搬不搬的問題，跟冰箱沒有關係。

第二，要建立證據鏈。要一環扣一環。逐步推進到你想要法官接受的那一鏈。

第三，要引人入勝。要提起法官的興趣，覺得不把此人趕走是對社會的危害。

最近我趕走了一個人。這是我在法庭上陳述的觀點。

The landlord complaints include:

1. Ms L was a trespasser. She moved into Unit 9 in late January without permission, although we received her application form.

2. She refused to sign a lease, and the management served her 3-day notice on 3/28/2012.

3. She did not answer and she did not return any calls from the management.

4. She owes $1950 dollars in back rent, late fee, and notice fee.

5. Ms L is responsible for paying her electricity consumption. I called the power company and the company said Ms L never set up an account to pay the electricity bill. So not paying rent is not her only no-pay activity. She took advantage of others when she can.

6. Police raid her apartment in February taking away 2 people that were wanted for drug charges.

7. Other tenants reported that dozens of people go through her apartment each day, each visitor staying a very short time, indicating a possible drug activity. Tenants also saw an increasing number of theft incidents.

1 抓住了法官的attention。基於這個，Ms L被給予三天時間搬出。

2-4 是正常不付房租的情況，幾乎人人相同。

5 也具有殺傷力。表明我不是第一個也不是最後一個被take advantage的人。

6-7 表明她對社會是個威脅。