Here is what another mistake buffet made.

來源: 天下多蚤 2012-05-07 16:53:15 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (623 bytes)

He says buy farm land and productive assets will outperform gold in 100 years.

Partially true.

He failed to mention business is a cycle. At every cycle, some assets outperform the others.

You can buy a farm, in 100 years of time, you may experience great depression that many farmer lost their land. You can buy a farm that experiences dust bowl that caues soil erosion. Not to mention tax burdens over 100 years.

Same is for gold. Same is for stocks. One guys stocks that many if not most are not likely to survive in 100 years.

So the key is business cycle and super cycles.

所有跟帖: 

no no gold is way better... -hercules007- 給 hercules007 發送悄悄話 hercules007 的博客首頁 (1265 bytes) () 05/07/2012 postreply 18:03:21

LOL, thanks. -天下多蚤- 給 天下多蚤 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/07/2012 postreply 18:08:11

You forget the human factor. -futufutu- 給 futufutu 發送悄悄話 (1545 bytes) () 05/08/2012 postreply 10:33:47

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”