我一直用 HR Block 軟件報稅,本次驚訝發現,當我欲再加一個上大學的孩子,以便降低繳稅額時,其稅額一分錢都不變;一番研究後發現,雖1個孩子和2個,3個稅額沒有區別,但隨著孩子的數量增加,AMT相應增加。故此認為,家庭收入高於20多萬(taxable income)的,似乎孩子生的再多,也得不到人頭的免稅額。 不知這是軟件故障,還是IRS的設計。希望有稅務專家給與核實。謝謝。
請教稅務專家:AMT將孩子也吃掉了?
所有跟帖:
•
沒錯!
-美西遊子-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
11:17:22
•
是IRS的設計
-SR99-
♀
(108 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
11:18:27
•
明白了,謝謝解答。
-tnbna-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
11:21:24
•
IRS will refund the previous AMT to you during the no AMT year
-逍遙流雲-
♀
(115 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
12:04:35
•
Is this true? never heard of it.More details please.
-SR99-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
13:35:53
•
I don't think so
-laoyangdelp-
♀
(387 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
15:51:24
•
Sure. Only time based AMT can be claimed back using 8801
-逍遙流雲-
♀
(128 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
17:17:30
•
most people here hit regular AMT not time-based AMT
-laoyangdelp-
♀
(60 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
19:49:14
•
More kids means more happiness
-wooddiy-
♂
(62 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
12:52:42
•
是滴。感謝真主IRS。
-jin_yin_hua-
♂
(49 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
13:38:29
•
not really
-zbj8888-
♂
(411 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
15:24:49
•
same in TurboTax
-zbj8888-
♂
(269 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
13:41:54
•
again, student has to support
-美西遊子-
♀
(157 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
16:09:43
•
是,我們每年都有AMT, taxable income多於22萬的,什麽也減不了,包括孩子的學費,退休金,等等。。。
-北美牡丹-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/18/2012 postreply
17:59:28