非加州居民從加州獲的退休金不需繳加州稅

來源: commonsense888 2012-04-02 15:26:28 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2535 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ commonsense888 ] 在 2012-04-02 16:24:01 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

幾天前討論退休後是否可以從加州居民轉成賭城居民,避免繳退休金的收入稅。有網友講,隻要錢從加州來的,都要繳加州稅。周末,查了一下。結論是,外洲居民在加州加州獲得的工資,生意所得,包括房租,需要繳加州所得稅。退休金,利息,股票獲利,免繳州稅。

雖然,加州房租要繳稅,退休金,利息,股票所得不用繳稅就很誘人了。現在已經vested退休金, 退休後每年可拿$30萬左右,按合同,每年最少會按通脹率漲。10年以後退休, 每年的退休金將會不少. 加上利息股票所得,是該盤算一下了。

http://www.taxprophet.com/archives/faq/faqjul14.html

from a tax lawyer

Determining California source income:

As a non-resident, you will be taxed on your California-source income: fees, wages, salaries, business income, rents or other income from real estate or other tangible personal property (vehicles, machinery, equipment) in the state.

A non-resident partner of a partnership has California-source income to the extent that the partnership receives income from California sources. The same is true for beneficiaries of a trust or an estate, shareholders of an "S" corporation (a corporation in which the shareholders, rather than the corporation, are taxed) and a limited liability company (usually taxed as a partnership).

To illustrate: a Nevada general partnership, with two 50% general partners living in Texas, owns a California apartment which generates $100,000 of net income. Each partner receives $50,000 of taxable California-source income from the partnership, even though the partnership is located in Nevada with partners from Texas, because the income is from a California apartment.

Intangible property (patents, copyrights, licenses and royalties) are generally sourced at the owner's domicile and are usually non-taxable. For instance, patent royalties received by a non-resident from a California corporation are non-taxable, even though the contract began when the taxpayer was a resident in the state. Alimony income, interest from bank accounts and interest from promissory notes are intangible assets and not taxable to a non-resident recipient. Likewise, a non-resident investor's purchase or sale of stock and bonds (considered intangible assets) through a California broker is not taxable.

Also, under a new federal law, California can no longer tax retirement payments received by non-residents who worked here when those benefits were earned.

所有跟帖: 

ssi肯定不用。pension不敢確定。最難的是要prove你不是加州居民。 -Nonsense123- 給 Nonsense123 發送悄悄話 Nonsense123 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/02/2012 postreply 15:40:30

新的聯邦法,外州居民的pension免稅。否則會有雙重稅的問題。 -commonsense888- 給 commonsense888 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/02/2012 postreply 16:31:45

wow - 退休後每年可拿$30萬左右 -Summer123- 給 Summer123 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/02/2012 postreply 16:37:09

對呀,有的地方pension是薪水的70%還是更多。警察就是。commonse老兄工資高。 -Nonsense123- 給 Nonsense123 發送悄悄話 Nonsense123 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/02/2012 postreply 16:50:26

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”