be careful, your conclusion is very wrong

來源: 大家幫我買房 2012-03-23 18:13:48 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (553 bytes)
回答: you are missing my pointegghead12012-03-23 12:52:58


You have to sell it at higher price, otherwise it's a negative cash flow property.

Unlike you said "every property has positive cashflow as long as you don't sell at a loss". Be careful here, you have to calculate IRR very year. As long as you don't sell, it's always negative cashflow for your low rent property. The truth about IRR is the efficiency of return. If you don't sell, and no positive cashflow collected each year, there's even no return. It's only qualified to be positive after you sell it at higher price. 

所有跟帖: 

that's exactly my point -egghead1- 給 egghead1 發送悄悄話 (425 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 19:50:12

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”