Bro, to some extent, I agree with you.

來源: Jy101 於 2012-03-23 12:22:19 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀： 次 (254 bytes)
回答: 既然老大這麽說了，我也就不解釋了 由 萬楓 於 2012-03-23 11:02:58
Your point of view, is base on accounting point of view, in that case, the cash flow can meaning everything in flow, including borrowed money.

My point of view, is from operational point of view, income over expense.

So there is no right or wrong.

所有跟帖： 

• :)) 當然， income over expense is 盈利指標 -萬楓- ♂ 給 萬楓 發送悄悄話 萬楓 的博客首頁 (227 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 12:44:10

• Unlike big corps, poor landlords don't have unlimited borrowing -Jy101- ♂ 給 Jy101 發送悄悄話 Jy101 的博客首頁 (117 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 12:55:50

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”