You are right. 把interest 和 principle 看反了。更正如下:

來源: 392 2012-02-02 19:32:09 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1023 bytes)

I will be doing my first tax return with rental property. Here is a typical example in my area:

Purchase price: 500k

Land value: 200k

Monthly depreciation: ((500k-200k)/(27.5x12)=0.91k

Monthly rent: 3k

It would be hard to come up with another $2.1k depreciation for this one house each month to offset the difference. A $400k (80% of purchase price) 30yr loan at 4% has a monthly interest cost of ~$1300. Other costs that I can think of are: property tax $400/month, monthly HOA ~$100, monthly insurance ~$100, mothly repair/landscape ~$100 ...what else can we come up with? Then the gain is about zero.

However, if 1% rule is followed, (i.e. good deal) the purchase price would be only $300k and the depreciation will be significantly less thus sizable gain for each house.

 

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”