Does PE really matter?

To which earnings (“E”) should we apply the P/E ratio? Valuation should be based on future earnings, not current earnings.” 

Robert Shiller, Yale Professor and Nobel Laureate, suggests a P/E ratio that normalizes earnings over the last 10 years and adjusts for inflation (the
cyclically adjusted price-earnings ratio, or “CAPE”). The 10-year period is meant to represent a full business cycle.

But Rob Arnott, Vitali Kalesnik, and Kim Maturzo (2018) point out that:

"Since 1996, the U.S. CAPE ratio has been above its long-term average (16.6) 96% of the time, and above 24, roughly one standard deviation above its historical norm, more than two-thirds of the time. This dislocation is long enough to make even the most ardent fans of the CAPE, take pause."

所有跟帖: 

PE 低的要回避,買股圖有發展空間,低 pe 低成長 -偷油老鼠- 給 偷油老鼠 發送悄悄話 (88 bytes) () 08/11/2025 postreply 04:11:37

巴菲特重倉壓注萍果股票時,萍果PE長期在12倍左右 -Livermore1- 給 Livermore1 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/11/2025 postreply 04:43:34

小散抓住已具市場規模的公司就夠了,初期是賭運氣,你可以查數據,比如蘋果 -偷油老鼠- 給 偷油老鼠 發送悄悄話 (82 bytes) () 08/11/2025 postreply 04:47:01

不matter了 -nancyjin5391- 給 nancyjin5391 發送悄悄話 (45 bytes) () 08/11/2025 postreply 06:32:57

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!