People have used it on weekly, daily, hourly, and 15 mins

本帖於 2025-04-28 08:04:50 時間, 由普通用戶 三心三意 編輯

15 mins is a pure guess, I have not been able to reliably use it. Traditional TA indicators probably better there

hourly is not reliable either, but can give early signal to the trend, which you can combine with daily to increase the probability

所有跟帖: 

QQQ 一直有個缺口,會不會去補一下呢? 您以前也提過他回踩時不太幹淨,沒回踩到位 -小鬆鬆- 給 小鬆鬆 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:17:08

Anything is possible :) But trend is most important. -三心三意- 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 三心三意 的博客首頁 (72 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:20:10

好的,謝謝。 -小鬆鬆- 給 小鬆鬆 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:21:03

幸好今天早上問了你一下~ -小鬆鬆- 給 小鬆鬆 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 11:28:49

用凱利公試和波浪結合,有個大概倉位比例就行了。4/4號我說QQQ390,400,420買都沒任何區別。現在看是不是這樣? -三心三意- 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 三心三意 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:25:36

是的,確實沒區別~ -小鬆鬆- 給 小鬆鬆 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:27:54

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!