嚇唬人的，基本上找不到你。

For liability for anyone's negligence, you have to have control over that person.

Therefore, employer would be responsible for damages caused by an employee during the conduct of employer's business, such as in the business of delivery, installation, repair etc. 

To hold a parent liable, the plaintiff has to show that the parent has control over the adult child.  Now, when the adult child was acting on behalf of the parent, such as picking up siblings, the adult child could be treated as the parent's employee (or agent 代理）.  so in this limited situation, the parent might be liable for harm caused during the conduct of  "family business".

If the child just harms someone on his/her own, usually the parents won't be liable. 

但是誰也不敢打包票，誰知道你和孩子會不會no zuo no die?

所有跟帖： 

• 你是對的，保險公司都說需要，律師基本上說與你相同，不過車和保險最好都在小孩名下 -start2020- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/23/2023 postreply 17:50:45

• 車和保險都在孩子名下，那麽自家傘險還能cover嗎？小孩自己名字買的車保險是不是特別貴？ -最愛荷花- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/23/2023 postreply 19:15:53

• 單買貴，傘險這塊我也弄不大清，成年子女父母問責這塊律師和保險公司說的不大相同 -start2020- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/23/2023 postreply 19:23:33

• 你家小孩那個年紀我們都出國了，當TA/RA買輛破車一年保險不也是照付？ -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (87 bytes) () 04/23/2023 postreply 20:20:00

• 檸檬大俠，我們都被700W嚇著了 -最愛荷花- ♀ (167 bytes) () 04/23/2023 postreply 20:41:45

• 要有點common sense -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (857 bytes) () 04/24/2023 postreply 06:41:35