同樣的邏輯

THE RIGHTS OF SELT-PROTECTION.
Upon the point that the argument against the Chinese was an argument against all immigration, he contended that objections to the one instance were inapplicable as to European immigrants, who became producers and consumers, meet our laborers on an equality, and assimilate with us and become part of our Government. None of these things were true of the Chinese... Not only our naturalization laws, but the Burlingame Treaty contained express provision against their naturalization.

https://www.teachushistory.org/nineteenth-century-immigration/resources/millers-speech?

關於反對中國人的論點是反對所有移民的論點，他爭辯說，"反對華人的邏輯不適用於歐洲移民，歐洲移民成為生產者和消費者，平等地與我們的勞動者會麵，並與我們同化並成為 我們政府的一部分。 這些事情都不是中國人的真實情況……不僅是我們的入籍法，而且伯林格姆條約都包含禁止華人入籍的明確條款。“