悠著點，這條州法涉嫌違憲，會受到挑戰的。

PROPERTY RIGHTS, HOUSING, AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION: THE SOCIAL BENEFITS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION, GOVERNMENT INTERVENTIONS, AND THE EUROPEAN COURT ON HUMAN RIGHTS' HUTTEN- CZAPSKA DECISION*
Edward H. Ziegler** and Jan G. Laitos ABSTRACT
Nations around the world utilize government interventions to promote the availability and affordability of housing. This Article focuses on various types of government regulatory interventions, such as rent controls, building dedications and exactions, and density and growth controls on housing. These interventions are common in the United States and in other countries and may contribute to inefficient resource allocation and poor housing outcomes. This Article examines whether these types of government interventions may require, in particular cases in the United States, judicially required compensatory damages for affected property owners. The social costs of these forms of government intervention are examined from the perspective of the benefits accruing from a regime of property rights protection. This Article further explains that there is some existing precedent under international human rights norms, as illustrated by the Hutten-Czapska v. Polandi decision, for the standards used in the United States for protecting the property rights of owners and developers of housing from excessive and unwise government regulation.
 

https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/iiclr/pdf/vol21p25.pdf

所有跟帖： 

• 按citizenship限製不違憲，因為citizenship不屬於protected category。 -Porcelana- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 11:16:41

• 出生地也不是吧？ -靈山問禪- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 11:20:06

• 反歧視法裏的protected classes隻包括這些： -Porcelana- ♀ (241 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 11:23:02

• 美國憲法保護美國土地上的所有人，所以無論人的國籍，隻要跟美國國土沾上邊，都是憲法保護的對象。 -小二哥李白- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 12:59:56