this is why I said you confuse two

來源: 檸檬椰子汁 2022-11-28 11:30:36 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (4678 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 檸檬椰子汁 ] 在 2022-11-28 11:32:43 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

1.  "duty to retreat" is the opposite of stand your ground law.  That is, in public places, you have a duty to retreat or you can stand your ground during a confrontation. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_retreat

"This requirement contrasts with the right in some other jurisdictions to stand one's ground, meaning being allowed to defend one's self instead of retreating."

2.  Castle doctrine means "your home is your castle", that you can defend your home (note, not your real estate property, but the home where you live) with deadly forces.  This is true for most states, of course details might vary. 

"In all duty to retreat states, the duty to retreat does not apply when the defender is in their own home. In ConnecticutDelawareHawaiiNebraska, and North Dakota, the duty to retreat does not apply when the defender is in their workplace. States may have both a Castle Doctrine and a Stand Your Ground variation, such as Iowa."

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/castle-doctrine-states?

3.  So where is the confusion?

The confusion lies in advocating "stand your ground" law.  Advocate want to pass "stand your ground" law as an extension of "castle doctrine". They say you should be defend your body just as you defend your home.  It is complete BS.  Home carries special meaning in all cultures, while allowing a fight in public space under stand your ground law when guns are everywhere is just dangerous. 

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”