i though

來源: puma_bill 2019-12-29 12:55:58 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (281 bytes)

even the letter was there during the closing.  my argument is:  i am not the expert but he is,  it is the reason i spent $700 for his advising the whole transaction because his negligence cost me the $4000 damage.

 

 

所有跟帖: 

Some clients ... -檸檬椰子汁- 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (303 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 13:01:43

you are wrong if you are an attorney and it is what you though -puma_bill- 給 puma_bill 發送悄悄話 puma_bill 的博客首頁 (179 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 13:13:46

這個人心裏陰暗,我為租房的事曾在法壇發帖求助,被他攻擊 -十裏荷花香- 給 十裏荷花香 發送悄悄話 十裏荷花香 的博客首頁 (137 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 15:25:52

壞檸檬? -sweetptt- 給 sweetptt 發送悄悄話 sweetptt 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 18:35:50

小姐,要打架也來法壇打,不要背後捅刀 -單身老貓- 給 單身老貓 發送悄悄話 單身老貓 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/30/2019 postreply 09:57:33

Greedy attorney!!! -不開竅- 給 不開竅 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 14:13:54

檸檬, 你的ID被偷了?這個700是正常的價格,律師應該幫買房人搞定的, 這4000的問題, 應該要事先搞定的 -螺絲螺帽- 給 螺絲螺帽 發送悄悄話 螺絲螺帽 的博客首頁 (98 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 20:27:11

謝謝 -puma_bill- 給 puma_bill 發送悄悄話 puma_bill 的博客首頁 (30 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 20:30:22

謝謝 -puma_bill- 給 puma_bill 發送悄悄話 puma_bill 的博客首頁 (30 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 20:30:22

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!