你說呢，難道先例不能推翻嗎？為什麽這些法官麵對這些問題擇詞那麽謹慎，很多時候不正麵回答，你以為那麽容易叫你抓漏洞？

IF YOUR TIME IS SHORT

• Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett all stressed the importance of precedence during Senate confirmation hearings.
• Each said Roe v. Wade is a precedent, but added caveats.
• Barrett said Roe is not a "super precedent." Gorsuch did not directly answer the super precedent question. Kavanaugh said he would listen to arguments that precedents were wrongly decided. 

所有跟帖： 

• 先例是可以推翻， 但是在判決中占有極大的權重。如果需要推翻慎重的考慮, 何況Roe是經過幾十次判決反複認證過的法律。 -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (532 bytes) () 05/06/2022 postreply 15:10:38

• 在聽證會上，為什麽他們不說和回避這是“super precedent." 你看不出來？ -未完的歌- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/06/2022 postreply 15:19:17

• 我聽不聽出來不是關鍵，關鍵他們是撒了謊， 比如Susan Collin 和 Murkowski 相信了他們， 投了讚成票 -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/06/2022 postreply 15:29:51

• 不懂法就說別人撒謊，哈哈。 -未完的歌- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/06/2022 postreply 15:42:26

• 懂法的也都說大法官們沒有integrity和honesty -alwaysluck- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/06/2022 postreply 16:33:34