你說呢，難道先例不能推翻嗎？為什麽這些法官麵對這些問題擇詞那麽謹慎，很多時候不正麵回答，你以為那麽容易叫你抓漏洞？

來源: 未完的歌 於 2022-05-06 14:49:58 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (1503 bytes)
本帖於 2022-05-06 14:53:38 時間, 由普通用戶 未完的歌 編輯

IF YOUR TIME IS SHORT

  • Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett all stressed the importance of precedence during Senate confirmation hearings.
  • Each said Roe v. Wade is a precedent, but added caveats.
  • Barrett said Roe is not a "super precedent." Gorsuch did not directly answer the super precedent question. Kavanaugh said he would listen to arguments that precedents were wrongly decided. 
請您先登陸，再發跟帖！