U班言過了。我想我最後一段引文應該說明我不是園餃子：-）其實

來源: 十方水土於 2012-04-07 09:40:33 [檔案] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀：次 (1218 bytes)

本文內容已被 [ 十方水土 ] 在 2012-04-08 22:10:04 編輯過。如有問題，請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

回答: Waycool說得對，將近十年前的機型和數據缺乏說服力。說點哲學的東西由 U96 於 2012-04-07 08:30:23

我是希望D800在astrophotography上有優勢的，原因很簡單，我現在用的是D300。

時至今日，(execuse me for using English from here on as entering Chinese in iPad is painful :-<) Canon indeed is still evidently more popular than Nikon among astrophotographers.One evidence: Nebulosity, a quite polular affordable astroimaging software, just released its v3 in Feb 2012. Try finding Nikon in the supported camera pulldown menu ... you will be disappointed.

For the age of the links: yes, they are old and I warned your eyes ；-). But I believe the credibility is not as weak as their age suggests, given the status quo of DSLR applications in astrophotography as well as the credibility of Jerry Rodriguss, who just published an artical about using DSLR for planet imaging in the latest issue of Sky & Telescope magazine, which is an influential magazine in amateur astronomer community world wide. And the other link was referred in Jerry's website.

You may have over interpreted my sentiment in this topic. But I always like your philosophical way of thinking a lot and am often amazed and amused by the great sense of humor and the penertrating power of your comments.