Nikon D800 is disappointing

I carefully compared the D800 sample photos from Russia, and at high ISO settings, it is not any better than the 4 year old Canon 5D2.  Under normal circumstances, one should not even need to perform such a comparison.

5D2's success was high MP with good high ISO noise.  Nikon's D800 achieved the first part but ignored the second part.  I was expecting D800 would be just like D700: a cheaper version of the D4 which should be a nice camera: high enough MP with good noise (by today's standard, not 4-year old standard).

Although I will not buy D800 one way or another, but I do hope Nikon would keep pressure on Canon.  For for now, I do not see Canon's future 5D3 would get any pressure from Nikon.

所有跟帖： 

• I won't bother to look at any test sites without lab control con -U96- ♂ (211 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 09:54:10

• ５N這麽好！！ -大大仙- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 10:07:07

• 你以為器材幫入手器材不先看評測乜？ -U96- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 10:21:33

• 哈哈哈！一圖頂千言！ -ragnarok- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 12:47:58

• This is RAW comparison -U96- ♂ (371 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 10:16:05

• 但D3比5D2貴很多吧。希望 D800比5D2好。 -tang07059- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 10:34:15

• 這裏比畫質不比價錢。尼康有同檔的D700，隻是不想讓這表太忙 -U96- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 10:36:20

• 明白你的意圖，我希望D800比5D2強，那麽買的動力就大了。 -tang07059- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 10:39:09

• 畫質D7000就已經好過5D2， D8000應該在=》D7000的水平 -天逸- ♂ (60 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 17:05:50

• RAW converter is very important -貪吃的豬豬- ♂ (218 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 14:27:25

• See inside: -pieq314- ♀ (615 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 11:33:17

• understood. no further argue on it. -U96- ♂ (138 bytes) () 02/16/2012 postreply 11:36:15