雖然算不得抄襲,但壁畫翻拍,也沒什麽太大的意思?

回答: 街拍劍伯2019-07-14 08:28:54

您的ID讓人不好稱呼呀:))請看下麵的文章。

Does photographing street art violate the street artist’s copyright?
Under U.S. copyright law, the violation of a copyright owner’s exclusive rights occurs when an infringer copies and/or creates a “derivative work” that is a copy or “substantially similar” to the copyright owner’s work. Thus, taking the photograph of a colorful mural alone, for the specific purpose of making a copy of the mural itself, may violate the mural artist’s copyright, especially if the image is then sold by the photographer for a commercial purpose (such as an advertisement). However, professional photographers often use street art as a backdrop to their projects or photograph the mural together with other elements, and creatively use lighting and composition to create something that is more unique and thus “original” to the photographer. In such cases, a defense known as “fair use” may apply. Unfortunately, though, there is currently no way to definitively measure when infringement ends and a new work begins.  

https://live.staticflickr.com/1945/44302092534_0625931a07_b.jpg

所有跟帖: 

謝謝冬夢的意見和提供的資料! -劍伯- 給 劍伯 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 07/15/2019 postreply 10:27:09

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!