答案

來源: guest007 2010-02-17 07:40:19 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (915 bytes)
1) The correct answer (99.5%) was posted by endodsuburbia on 1/31/2010. The answer was logically well written (so maybe that's the excuse to understand?).
2) Jinjing did not get it (so did you, or you’ve never read) and questioned the same day.
3) The correct answer was posted again in plain language the same day by wxczcbm to help the rest of the readers.
4) Now Jinjing understood (and I even joked at him/her… slowness- now my apologies to Jinjing).

So, may I assume you still did not get it, or you still have not read it - initially, after wxczcbm’s explanation, and even after I teased at you yesterday?

I posted in Chinese for your conveyance:

1)正確答案是endodsuburbia在張貼2010年1月31日。
2)Jinjing沒有理解它(你也是,或者你從來沒有讀)。
3)同一天正確答案再次被張貼.wxczcbm用更淺易的語言。
4) 然後Jinjing才理解. (你仍然沒有理解,或者你仍然沒有讀)。

所有跟帖: 

回複:答案 -看看想想- 給 看看想想 發送悄悄話 (191 bytes) () 02/17/2010 postreply 20:51:18

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”