one more comment

來源: dynamic 2009-04-25 03:02:49 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1066 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ dynamic ] 在 2009-04-30 07:14:03 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
回答: 回複:朋友們試試這個,不知道幾星dynamic2009-04-25 02:36:31
The proof goes like this for n mod 4 = 3 (also works for n mod 4 = 1):

By the construction in claim 2 we got a proper coloring for white grids. Suppose we also have a proper coloring for black grids.

Observation: If a black grid is on the boundary, then its red white neighbor is also on the boundary. This follows by the nature of the construction in claim 2.

Notice that each internal grid covers 4 grids, each non-corner boundary grid covers 3, and each corner covers 2. Also notice that at least 2 corners are white red, so the number of white grids covered by black red grids is at least larger than the black grids covered by 2. Notice that in a proper coloring each grid is covered exactly once and the # of black grids and white grids differ by 1, so we have a contradiction.

To see the last part:

internal red black (covers 4) -> neighboring red white (covers 3 or 4)
boundary red black (covers 3) -> neighboring red white (covers 2 or 3)
however, at least 2 corners are covered, so the difference is at least 2.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”