Although the prevailing supposition has been that it is too hot for microorganisms to survive deep below the Earth's surface,some scientists argue that there are living communities of microorganisms there that have been cut off from surface life for millions of years.These scientists base their argument on the discovery of living microorganisms in samples of material that were taken from holes drilled as deep as 1.74 miles.The scientists' argument depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. The microorganisms brought up were of a species that is related to those previously know to science.
B.No holes have been drilled into the Earth's surface to a distance deeper than 1.74 miles.
C.The microorganisms did not come from surface soil that came into contact with the drilling equipment.
D.The stratum from which the samples came has been below the surface of the Earth ever since the Earth came into existence.
E.The temperature at the bottom of the holes drilled was not significantly hotter than that of the hottest spots on the Earth's surface.
我選的答案是D,但是正確答案是C,也是怎麽都想不通原因.請邏輯好的同學們給點撥一下.
第2題...請邏輯好的高手給解釋一下.
所有跟帖:
• 回複:第2題...請邏輯好的高手給解釋一下. -我是帥哥我怕誰- ♂ (545 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 17:47:35
• 我這題的答案是D,我認為D也是非常有道理的 -陶陶樂,樂陶陶- ♀ (215 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 17:54:58
• 回複:我這題的答案是D,我認為D也是非常有道理的 -我是帥哥我怕誰- ♂ (65 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 18:19:45
• 回複:回複:我這題的答案是D,我認為D也是非常有道理的 -陶陶樂,樂陶陶- ♀ (66 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 18:49:52
• 不能選D,這裏有一個知識點. -ntotl- ♂ (229 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 18:59:08
• 回複:不能選D,這裏有一個知識點. -陶陶樂,樂陶陶- ♀ (168 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 19:06:29
• 出題的人可能把它作為"常識"處理了. -ntotl- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 19:08:20
• 更加說明我的"常識"太少了,... -陶陶樂,樂陶陶- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 19:10:36
• 我又看了一下,從邏輯上,答案d也不能支持. -ntotl- ♂ (50 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 19:13:10
• 你說的沒錯 -陶陶樂,樂陶陶- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 19:17:19
• 即使答案D是正確的,也隻不過是已陳述事實的補充,而不是另一個假設條件. -ntotl- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2010 postreply 20:17:15