回複:大家看看這段是否有錯?摘自美國傳統雜誌。。。

來源: selfselfself 2009-10-22 20:29:15 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (254 bytes)
Rearrange the wording then you can tell clearer

we seemed willing neither to fight to win nor (to) end the sacrifice if it was not worth the cost.

more suspiciously

gone (were) the way of dueling, cavalry charges, and trench warfare.

所有跟帖: 

同意 -忌憶- 給 忌憶 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/22/2009 postreply 20:46:23

回複:回複:大家看看這段是否有錯?摘自美國傳統雜誌。。。 -akc- 給 akc 發送悄悄話 (295 bytes) () 10/23/2009 postreply 06:40:48

but ... -nothingjustagain- 給 nothingjustagain 發送悄悄話 (102 bytes) () 10/23/2009 postreply 09:23:56

in a formal writing, of is more used in the kind of cases -nothingjustagain- 給 nothingjustagain 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/23/2009 postreply 09:38:35

the first fix is a must; the second not because ... -nothingjustagain- 給 nothingjustagain 發送悄悄話 (90 bytes) () 10/23/2009 postreply 09:35:00

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”