There is no easy way to sort it out.

來源: dhyang_wxc 2024-03-11 09:04:45 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1240 bytes)

I have been thinking along this line for quite some years now.

 "Equal justice under the law" as principle fundamental, it is only applicable to the law domain. There are domains with other rules superceding or competing with the law, such as the realtionship(s) between the creator(no necessaily the God) and men, man and himself, dilemma situations (e.g. trolley problem for antopilot car), etc. In ancient Chinese thoughts, there are 7 major domains in a 5-level system.

蒙格語錄與《論語》

《中國哲學之結構》內容簡介 

The society is not a single flat piece. People had been trying to analyze it by different models. I found Qian Mu's model so far had been the best (城市,鄉鎮,山林,江湖), which can be used to understand new laws' forming and concurrent law's implementing. An article in recent years observed the same. (How America Fractured Into Four Parts)  I guess the author just collected and counted 4 without a full view as Qian Mu.

所有跟帖: 

錢穆 speculation but not solutions. ejul provides solutions -TJKCB- 給 TJKCB 發送悄悄話 TJKCB 的博客首頁 (349 bytes) () 03/11/2024 postreply 15:07:02

If you take the law as a live system, then Qian Mu's -dhyang_wxc- 給 dhyang_wxc 發送悄悄話 dhyang_wxc 的博客首頁 (297 bytes) () 03/12/2024 postreply 07:21:41

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”