'that' leads an adj clause to qualify 'epic' which

itself serves to explain the title. This seems to be what the writer wanted.

Without 'that,' the whole thing becomes a complete sentence. It comes next to but is still independent of the title.

所有跟帖: 

我是不懂隻要一個單獨的核心詞就成立,是嗎? -妖妖靈- 給 妖妖靈 發送悄悄話 妖妖靈 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/24/2023 postreply 20:55:13

I'd treat the "A Magnificent ..." as a sub-title. -7grizzly- 給 7grizzly 發送悄悄話 7grizzly 的博客首頁 (198 bytes) () 10/24/2023 postreply 21:03:06

sub-title這個定義好,比我說的核心詞清楚明了。晚安二位。:) -盈盈一笑間- 給 盈盈一笑間 發送悄悄話 盈盈一笑間 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/24/2023 postreply 21:14:38

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!