Isareli aerial defense system

來源: 永遠老李 2023-10-13 07:43:21 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1788 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 永遠老李 ] 在 2023-10-13 09:25:36 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

Aerial defense system is not new. During cold war, both America and Russia developed some kind of system to protect their cities and important military targets. China once imported Russian missle system to intercept Taiwan high attittude reconnaisance plane in 60s. But it was Isarel used American defense system Patriot missle to protect Isarel cities from Iraqi SCUD missle attack in the first Gulf War in 1991. It worked quite well. 

It seems Isarel uses new Iron Dome system purchased from France instead of from Uncle Sam. I guess the basic principle remains the same: a system to detect incoming weapon from air and send the info to own actual counter attack missile to intercept the warhead in the air. From video clips on media, it appears the system worked well. It did hit the targets in mid air. 

However there is an issue for this approach: the system is designed to destroy high value weapon such as missile from enemy which is accurate, powerful and dangerous. I don't think it is designed for crappy, low budget and small capacity rockets. It is simply not cost effective. It is somehow like using tank canon to shoot mosquitos. Of course you can easily blow up the tiny insect into peices but it is awfully expensive. In the recently Hamas attack, vast majority of Isareli casuality came from armed ground assaults. It is not caused by those rockets. It seems those flying rockets are only for show. It looks spectacular but it barely do anything. 

Anyway, I guess lots of military experts and scientists are watching this conflict closely. You can only know the true value of weapon system in actual combat. Mid East has been a great weapon test site for long period of time. 

 

所有跟帖: 

謝謝科普。占位點讚。回頭細看。:) -盈盈一笑間- 給 盈盈一笑間 發送悄悄話 盈盈一笑間 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 07:55:03

There's safety in numbers. WWII, German tankers said one -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:13:04

One Tiger tank can take down 10 American Sherman tanks -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:13:49

But the American can always have the 11th Sherman -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:20:51

Think about the Great Wall. It never stopped invasion -方外居士- 給 方外居士 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:29:07

Girls hated the GW: one wrecked it by crying at it, -7grizzly- 給 7grizzly 發送悄悄話 7grizzly 的博客首頁 (70 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 09:45:13

Sugar daddy? -方外居士- 給 方外居士 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 10:00:05

吳三桂 -7grizzly- 給 7grizzly 發送悄悄話 7grizzly 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 10:02:03

哈哈哈,慟哭六軍皆縞素,衝冠一怒為紅顏! -方外居士- 給 方外居士 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 10:12:59

That was the bloke :-) -7grizzly- 給 7grizzly 發送悄悄話 7grizzly 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 10:30:11

French Maginot Line, WWII -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 10:08:11

Right! -方外居士- 給 方外居士 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 10:13:36

When it comes to national defense, it is not all or nothing. -renqiulan- 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 renqiulan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:38:54

In real life, and especially in a real war, we use -renqiulan- 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 renqiulan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:40:22

what we have. We improvise and, hopefully, improve going -renqiulan- 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 renqiulan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:41:55

forward.Ditto our enemies. Let's see who will come ahead. -renqiulan- 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 renqiulan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:44:41

We can and must count on our ingenuity and audacity. -renqiulan- 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 renqiulan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:47:01

Under saturated attack the efficiency'll be compromised -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:45:24

But not Hamas can't sustain -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 08:46:43

Like shooting at a bullet with a bullet, amazing! -waterfowl- 給 waterfowl 發送悄悄話 waterfowl 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 13:32:37

聽說如果空襲,或者核戰,DC.和紐約會是世界上最安全的地方,因為美國是空中攔截的重點保護對象? -盈盈一笑間- 給 盈盈一笑間 發送悄悄話 盈盈一笑間 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 15:26:42

據說,DC的地鐵都是防核彈設計的。 -盈盈一笑間- 給 盈盈一笑間 發送悄悄話 盈盈一笑間 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 15:29:26

地下是很理想的防核衝擊波,高溫和核汙染的地方 -永遠老李- 給 永遠老李 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 16:04:29

美國曾經設想過星球大戰計劃,可以從太空保護整個美國。由於蘇聯崩潰,這計劃用不著了 -永遠老李- 給 永遠老李 發送悄悄話 (54 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 15:53:16

因為在紐約,總感覺瑟瑟發抖。如果真發生戰爭,還是往中部玉米地跑,比較安全吧? -盈盈一笑間- 給 盈盈一笑間 發送悄悄話 盈盈一笑間 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 16:20:41

淡定。在美國發生大規模戰爭的可能性甚微。美國每年無法數記的軍費不是鬧著玩的 -永遠老李- 給 永遠老李 發送悄悄話 (96 bytes) () 10/13/2023 postreply 17:30:36

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”