The left is pro-immigration, the right is anti-immigration. Who is right?
Recently, the issue of refugee settlement has sparked a heated debate on Canadian immigration policy. Many refugees in Toronto have been living on the streets for weeks without a home. The Canadian government plans to absorb 500,000 new immigrants per year by 2025, while online rumors say that 1.5 million immigrants have already arrived last year. Of course, the rumors on the Internet use maximum speculation, including many foreign students and accompanying students who have not immigrated. No matter whether they are an immigrant or not, as long as they enter Canada, they will need housing. This has caused a sharp increase in housing pressure. Originally, the central bank raised interest rates and house prices would fall. Now that the central bank has raised interest rates, house prices have dropped and rebounded, because the speed of building new houses cannot keep up with the rate of population increase, and the rapid rate of population increase is mainly due to immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers.
Immigration is an economic policy. As Canada's population ages due to the retirement of the baby boomers, a larger labor force is necessary to maintain Canada's economic growth and improved living standards. According to the economic assessment of the banking institution, Canada needs a 2.2% annual increase in the employment population. Modern immigrants are not like the Chinese who came to Canada in the early years. In the era when the Chinese came for Gold Rush and built Pacific Railway, they were men who were 100% pure laborers. But now immigrants need to be more humane, and they have to bring parents, wives, and children, as well as capital and talents.
Canada is rich in resources, and the combination of labor and resources can grow the economy. There is absolutely nothing wrong with immigration policy as economic policy. For example, oversea students immigrate, the foreign students come first to consume, pay tuition, pay rent, and buy daily necessities. This is a net benefit to Canada's economic growth. They do not immigrate until they graduate and find a job. They merge into the Canadian economy seamlessly. Economic benefits have already been generated. It can be said that the more such immigrants, the better. Moreover, the cost of raising these international students and teenagers is all borne by foreign countries, and it does not cost Canada a penny of economic costs.
The problem is that many new immigrants today are refugees and asylum seekers, and this part of the immigration is not the result of economic policy, but the result of political policy. Many of today's social and economic problems due to immigration are due to refugees and asylum seekers who come in because of political policies, not because of economic policies.
First, there was a group of asylum seekers crossing the border from the United States into Quebec. The asylum seekers flew from Nigeria on U.S. tourist visas to the U.S. and then crossed the Quebec border into Canada on foot. It is unusual for this group of people to be able to obtain US entry visas. Applying for a US visa is not easy. Moreover, the United States is the country that least welcomes refugees among all its allies. Secondly, these asylum seekers are not poor if they can buy air tickets. They come in wearing Nike shoes and holding mobile phones. These people's living standards are not low. In order to receive these people, the Canadian government paid for them to live in hotels in the tourist resort of Nicaragua Falls. What kind of political asylum is this? No investigation report cannot be seen in the media. However, since it is political asylum and since it is possible to obtain a US entry visa, it must be the "democratic soft power" of the United States. Why asylum? It's just that the local area can't accommodate them. These people cannot be climate change refugees. The United States is building the Berlin Wall 2.0 on the US-Mexico border, and it certainly cannot issue visas to refugees. When NATO bombed Libya, NATO bombing and ground armed forces cooperated to hunt down and kill Gaddafi. These armed forces that cooperate with NATO bombing on the ground are natural allies of democracy. Now the Libyan economy has collapsed, and the slave market has come out of the collapse. Of course, those who were sold as slaves could not buy air tickets, nor could they apply for US visas. These political asylums are mainly placed by the church. The church has many charitable non-governmental organizations overseas. NGOs spread democracy overseas and are the social connections of these democratic political asylums. However, it is difficult for this kind of connection to integrate refugees into society and the Canadian economy. Charity organizations are full of social activists. Their greatest help to asylum seekers is to inform them of the government programs helping them, which in the end are still the government's burden. Different from economic immigrants, economic immigrants include skilled immigrants, who often apply for immigration with a company letter of employment, and integrate into the Canadian economy as soon as they arrive in Canada.
The second is that the United States abandoned Afghanistan in 2020, and Canada accepted a large number of Afghan refugees. There are many Afghan refugees, and those who can be accepted by Canada must be Afghans working for the Allied Forces. There is a mismatch between that kind of work and the Canadian job market. How many companies need Afghani translation? Moreover, many of them are widowed children of freedom fighter martyrs. Afghans are polygamous, and a freedom fighter martyr can leave several women and a bunch of children. According to Afghan Islamic doctrine, many Afghan women do not work, and employment skills are naturally out of the question. Our government values them highly and provides them with welfare benefits. This batch of children who need support and study is the cost of Canada's economy and the financial burden of the government.
During the turmoil in Hong Kong in 2019, Canada accepted another batch of Hong Kong refugees, granted Hong Kong people special immigration channels, lowered the immigration threshold, and provided more assistance for social integration. These are political immigrants for democracy and human rights, not economic immigrants. Their knowledge structure of democracy and human rights is different from the knowledge structure of human resources demanded by the job market.
In 2022, another group of Ukrainian refugees came in during the Ukrainian War. Many of them were studying in Canada and were given special preferential treatment to war immigrants and basic guarantees of life. There are male and female soldiers in the Ukrainian war, not only young people who resolutely defend Ukraine but also men of the right age stipulated by the government to go to the battlefield. Therefore, many Ukrainian refugees immigrating to Canada are not laborers, but old, weak, sick, and disabled. The proportion of Canadians of Ukrainian origin in the western plains of Canada is very high. After the completion of the Pacific Railway, the immigrants resettled in the three western provinces were mainly Ukrainians, because the three western provinces, like Ukraine, are all plains, wheat-producing areas, and the world's bread basket. Therefore, it is relatively easy for Ukrainian refugees to settle in the West. However, this kind of immigration policy is not designed to solve the problem of the aging population structure and may become a burden on the Canadian economy and government finances for a period of time.
There is no market economy in Canada today, only a geopolitical economy. Canadian immigration policy is largely dominated by geopolitical policies. Therefore, to accuse the Trudeau government of failure in immigration policy is deceptive. The difficulty of resettling refugees is the cost of Canada's geopolitical policies. If it is for the noble values ??of democracy and freedom in Canada, there should be no problem in sacrificing a little standard of living. There is a saying: Give me freedom or give me death. Who cares about a little economic sacrifice with a noble cause? When politicians talk about Canada's commitment to stand up for democracy and freedom in the international arena, they are all impassioned and swear. But, strangely enough, it is often those politicians who have supported democracy and freedom on the international stage, that attacked Trudeau's immigration policy the most and most severely. When they attacked Trudeau's immigration policy, they talked about refugees living on the streets, the increase in crime rate, and the increase in housing costs. The only thing that they avoided talking about these political immigrants was part of Canada's value diplomacy.
Normal economic migration is not the cause of refugees on the streets, nor of increased crime, nor of increased housing costs. Political immigration is not aimed to produce economic benefits so it could be economic burdens and become the cause of these social problems. These politicians should show moral courage and a sense of justice, and explain to the public that Canadians have to make some economic sacrifices for the cause of democracy and human rights. Most Canadian citizens can accept this cost. But instead of doing that, these politicians are blaming immigrants for everything, creating hatred against newcomers, which is extremely damaging to the Canadian economy. Opposing all immigration indiscriminately will only cause more economic damage to Canada. In the end, political immigration cannot be reduced, but economic immigration could be reduced. Government tax revenue cannot be increased, government debt can only continue to increase, and inflation will continue. Anti-immigration politicians incite racial discrimination and social unrest.
The government and economists have clearly explained the need for Canada's economic immigration, which is to solve the problem of population aging. However, political immigration is left unaccounted for, leading to confusion in public thinking. Is immigration good or bad? The left is pro-immigration and the right is anti-immigration, tearing apart Canadian society over immigration. Because the two kinds of immigrants are confused. Political immigration does not contribute to economic growth, at least in the short term it is a social and economic burden and a burden on government finances. So why don't politicians have the courage to explain it to the public? Because of the failure of value diplomacy. Libya was bombed for human rights. Is the human rights situation in Libya better or worse today? In order to counter terrorism, NATO occupied Afghanistan, had Afghan terrorist organizations increased or decreased? It is of course Canada's incumbent responsibility to accept refugees, as refugees come from areas where Canada exerts or supports the influence of its allies to intervene. For example, in the 2019 turmoil in Hong Kong, Canada publicly supported it, and of course, it is obligatory to accept Hong Kong refugees.
But democratic governments should be accountable to taxpayers. If taxpayers’ money is spent on democracy and human rights, taxpayers should be reported on the performance of promoting democracy and human rights. In Afghanistan, money was spent and soldiers were sacrificed. How much have human rights and democracy in Afghanistan been promoted? Supporting the allies to bomb Libya, how far had it advanced the progress of human rights in Libya? A report must be given to the taxpayer. Otherwise, the government can't spend taxpayers' money endlessly for nothing.
Canada accepted refugees, causing social problems, economic problems and government financial difficulties. Some politicians attack the Trudeau government's immigration policy, but firmly pushing the Trudeau government to implement value diplomacy. This is a trick for politicians to play dirty politics, promote some policies that cause difficulties for the government, and then use these difficulties to attack the government. They do not ask whether the value diplomacy they promote is effective.
There is no moral problem in supporting democracy and human rights internationally. However, using democracy and human rights as an excuse to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries has led to the global refugee crisis, without any achievements in democracy and human rights. It is a waste of taxpayers' money and endangers Canada's society and economy. These politics are not reviewed by the party in power, and neither are the opposition parties. Turning a blind eye has opened a big hole in Canada's finances. This can't help but make some voters question, what's wrong with our democratic government. Why is taxpayer money wasted, instead of advancing democracy and human rights, it hurts Canada's own society and economy.
Economic immigration is in the national interest of Canada. Political immigration is the cost to Canada. The payment of this cost has not achieved Canada's international democratic and human rights goals. It has only created a failed country and created refugees so Canada cannot shirk its responsibility to accept these refugees. It can only be said that Canada's foreign policy is not in line with Canada's interests, and it is of no benefit to democracy and human rights in the world and even damages the international human rights situation. If it does not damage the international human rights situation, there will not be refugee problems.
To solve the refugee problem, we must find the root cause and solve the problem at the root. Since Canada's external value diplomacy is ineffective, not only ineffective, but also harmful to Canada's national interests, the current value diplomacy should be abandoned, and the policy of interfering in the internal affairs of other countries should be abandoned. No matter how high-sounding these policies are described by politicians, they are ineffective and harmful policies that must be abandoned. Those politicians who oppose immigration should not play dirty politics. To solve the immigration problem, the first thing to oppose is the foreign policy of allies who create turmoil and refugees, and oppose the foreign policy of wasting taxpayers' money and harming taxpayers' interests.
(華山論劍電台）
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
