I won't debate that because that is true. Medical ..........

來源: renqiulan 2023-01-07 16:36:52 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (767 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ renqiulan ] 在 2023-01-07 16:40:09 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

science has its limit and its potential. That is also a fact. The vast majority of medical practitioners, needless to say, are doing their best. They save their patients. They lose their patients. They are human. They make success stories as well as mistakes. When it comes to pandemics, public policies matter more than individual medical professionals. Free and open information, for example, will get you an informed public. An informed public will be better prepared than an ill-informed one. All good doctors are good communicators. Good communicators tend to attract good listeners. Good listeners tend to be more understanding, more rational, and more responsible for their informed consent. Of course, it is easier said than done.

所有跟帖: 

想起最近的事情,建議一個人去體檢,由於從他的敘述,從醫學角度有潛在疾病可能,但也有可能沒事,所以沒事的時候他會覺得烏鴉嘴 -jianchi9090- 給 jianchi9090 發送悄悄話 jianchi9090 的博客首頁 (593 bytes) () 01/08/2023 postreply 12:07:15

文友所說的都是十分接地氣的話。對心智正常的人而言,行使自主權即是承擔後果,所以要簽名為證。這也是契約法的精神。 -renqiulan- 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 01/08/2023 postreply 13:47:22

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”