Is the US actually losing its trade war against China?

來源: 唵啊吽 2023-01-06 13:17:50 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (8420 bytes)

Is the US actually losing its economic leverage in the China-US trade war?

Yes. The US is losing its moral high ground. China has adopted a market economy according to the liberal democracy point of view in the last 40 years, accepting that free competition in the market economy is good for the world. Now the US is using its state apparatus heavy-handed to interfere with the global supply chains, trying to win not by free competition but by sanctions and blockages.

The military-industrial complex and a few monopoly capitals may win in the trade war because they profit a lot in the 2022 world turmoil. Yet the people of the US as a whole are losing because of inflation. Their living standard decreased due to the trade war against China. People of China, on the other hand, still maintain their living standard if it is not improving.

The trade war is a loss-loss game. Both the US and China are losing. If look into the inflation rates, we notice that the US has an inflation rate 4 times as high as that of China. The people of the US lost a lot by waging a trade war against China.

One of the aggregated indexes measuring the overall living standard is life expectancy. During the trade war waged by Trump, the life expectancy in the US dropped while the life expectancy in China keep claiming. Now China has a longer life expectancy than the US.

You may argue that the drop in life expectancy in the US is due to COVID. The US is the leading country in medical and virus study and research and has the most advanced healthcare resources. The medical facilities in the US per capita are much higher than in China. The US failed to protect its people from the virus because the US government is using the pandemic for its trade war against China. The US is not fighting the virus but taking the opportunity of the pandemic to suppress China. More than a million Americans died of COVID for the sake of a trade war against China.

With today’s technology and productivity, people of the world can and should improve their living standards as a whole. That’s why China advocates win-win cooperation. Yet the US opts to the loss-loss game of the trade war.

The trade war and tech war are bad for China, the US, and the world. If mankind can make the optimal choices, they shouldn’t have put themself in such a situation. All people of the world can and should live prosperously. They can’t because some oligarchs are profiting from the new cold war against China.

Americans are losing in the trade war. The people of the world are losing in the trade war and in the new cold war against China.

所有跟帖: 

大牛英文表達流暢!英文口語怎麽樣?哪天說一個? -妖妖靈- 給 妖妖靈 發送悄悄話 妖妖靈 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 13:59:04

我口語不行。我去Toastmaser International有兩年了。這裏有我一個演講視頻。 -唵啊吽- 給 唵啊吽 發送悄悄話 唵啊吽 的博客首頁 (138 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 19:40:12

繪聲繪色,很棒啊!為什麽要留胡子呢?不要胡子是不是更好?我覺得你和魯迅的相片很像。:) -妖妖靈- 給 妖妖靈 發送悄悄話 妖妖靈 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 20:39:40

謝謝。魯迅可能講日語。 -唵啊吽- 給 唵啊吽 發送悄悄話 唵啊吽 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/07/2023 postreply 07:57:21

我很敢說,今天上班開會,我肯定是發言的前兩三名了,所以,希望自己的口音越少越好,別丟人:) -妖妖靈- 給 妖妖靈 發送悄悄話 妖妖靈 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 20:41:32

工作一段時間,同事都會接受一些口音,對工作交流沒有太大影響。 -唵啊吽- 給 唵啊吽 發送悄悄話 唵啊吽 的博客首頁 (288 bytes) () 01/07/2023 postreply 07:56:37

是像魯迅先生!哈哈哈 -rockcurrent- 給 rockcurrent 發送悄悄話 rockcurrent 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 20:55:41

哈哈哈,英雄所見略同啊:)還有誰也這麽覺得? -妖妖靈- 給 妖妖靈 發送悄悄話 妖妖靈 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 21:25:10

我也覺得。:) -jianchi9090- 給 jianchi9090 發送悄悄話 jianchi9090 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/07/2023 postreply 14:12:20

大家都是英雄:) -妖妖靈- 給 妖妖靈 發送悄悄話 妖妖靈 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/07/2023 postreply 14:44:10

沒想到美國那條線掉得這麽厲害。 我本來一直覺得中國經濟不行了、 -jianchi9090- 給 jianchi9090 發送悄悄話 jianchi9090 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 16:18:48

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”