Hilary Clinton again , 第十六部分

本文內容已被 [ 2msmom ] 在 2012-05-16 21:58:25 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

歡迎大家批評指正

In a short span, we have taken significant strides to translate the promise of these technologies into results that make a difference. But there is still so much more to be done. And as we work together with the private sector and foreign governments to deploy the tools of 21st century statecraft, we have to remember our shared responsibility to safeguard the freedoms that I’ve talked about today. We feel strongly that principles like information freedom aren’t just good policy, not just somehow connected to our national values, but they are universal and they’re also good for business.

To use market terminology, a publicly listed company in Tunisia or Vietnam that operates in an environment of censorship will always trade at a discount relative to an identical firm in a free society. If corporate decision makers don’t have access to global sources of news and information, investors will have less confidence in their decisions over the long term. Countries that censor news and information must recognize that from an economic standpoint, there is no distinction between censoring political speech and commercial speech. If businesses in your nations are denied access to either type of information, it will inevitably impact on growth.

所有跟帖: 

An excellent reading! I admire you. -NewVoice- 給 NewVoice 發送悄悄話 NewVoice 的博客首頁 (157 bytes) () 05/15/2012 postreply 09:08:08

點得很準。謝謝。 -2msmom- 給 2msmom 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/15/2012 postreply 15:39:24

你的長元音I 發的真好啊。你的很多音都說的很地道。好奇你是不是曾跟VOA模仿過? -midnightblue- 給 midnightblue 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/15/2012 postreply 12:23:51

試過VOA, 但沒耐心。 太慢,太短。後來直接就跟Hillary 了。 -2msmom- 給 2msmom 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/15/2012 postreply 15:36:20

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!