Grabed it, thanks so much. I don't quite like Fou's

來源: 碧薇 於 2010-03-06 13:37:26 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (124 bytes)
回答: Thanks very much for your efforts. Fou Ts'ong's and 由 碧薇 於 2010-03-06 12:00:32

interpretations of Mozart, though. Seems like he read too much literati sensibility into Mozart :)

I could be wrong.

所有跟帖： 

• There's nothing right or wrong here. However, who's Mozart -Passerby- ♀ 給 Passerby 發送悄悄話 (719 bytes) () 03/06/2010 postreply 16:11:17

• How about Gieseking's Mozart? -Passerby- ♀ 給 Passerby 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/06/2010 postreply 16:18:30

• Yes, I like the lesser known #22 as well. -碧薇- ♀ 給 碧薇 發送悄悄話 碧薇 的博客首頁 (558 bytes) () 03/06/2010 postreply 19:03:15

• I visited you blog and had a field day. A little surprised to se -Passerby- ♀ 給 Passerby 發送悄悄話 (816 bytes) () 03/06/2010 postreply 21:12:19

• I agree that Kempff isn't a good pick for Chopin, esp. -碧薇- ♀ 給 碧薇 發送悄悄話 碧薇 的博客首頁 (486 bytes) () 03/06/2010 postreply 21:39:11

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！