被lay-off

if you go to appeal, the employer needs to evidence that you are incompetent for this role of something else.

the critical is whether a mom-to-be is legally allowed being fired according to the local employment law.

if the law says a mom-to-be can not be fired, you got much advantage. but, is your employer knew that or not?

you'd better to find WHAT made your employer decide to kick you out?

dont be intimidated, it is your job and you got to fight for RIGHTS of yourself!

所有跟帖： 

• Thank you. He told me I have done a great job, it's just -子璿- ♀ (414 bytes) () 03/03/2009 postreply 08:18:57

• 回複：Thank you -refined- ♀ (997 bytes) () 03/03/2009 postreply 10:28:17

• god, it is ridiculous to use pregnancy -UUMA- ♂ (199 bytes) () 03/03/2009 postreply 13:53:00

• I agree with you. Funny thing is her employer didn't even know s -settlingdown- ♀ (154 bytes) () 03/03/2009 postreply 14:02:22

• laidoffs for economic reasons don't need any proof -settlingdown- ♀ (102 bytes) () 03/03/2009 postreply 14:03:47

• You are right. Someone didn't read what she said. -jin_yin_hua- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/03/2009 postreply 14:42:18

• make sure you differentiate redundancy and dismissal and -refined- ♀ (68 bytes) () 03/03/2009 postreply 22:01:51

• 回複：make sure you differentiate redundancy and dismissal and -單身老貓- ♂ (83 bytes) () 03/04/2009 postreply 06:05:11

• I want to know it too, please~ -子璿- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/04/2009 postreply 06:14:06

• LZ lives in US. She said in her post she herself didn't even kno -settlingdown- ♀ (166 bytes) () 03/04/2009 postreply 10:07:36

• LZ lives in US -refined- ♀ (721 bytes) () 03/05/2009 postreply 10:56:55