she is actually lucky in that she did not respond. The reason? If she responded, technically, she would be surrendering her personal jurisdiction to the court -- right now, the court still has no jurisdiction over her. Therefore, she has the standing in challenging THIS specific judgement.
You are right in that a Chinese court can and will refuse the judgement by a PA court. The bottomline in this case is that if the guy wants to divorce, there is nothing she can do. But technically, she could avoid THIS judgement, and reopen the case somewhere else -- then, the problem would be to find a state that could assert personal jurisdiction over the guy, reopen the case, and get a better term on the alimony and child support.
Honestly, I would not slam an "no" answer to the person who ask the question. Really, she should consult a family law specialist in PA.
回複:回複:seek to void the judgement for..
所有跟帖:
• 回複:回複:回複:seek to void the judgement for.. -單身老貓- ♂ (1646 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 08:08:25
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:seek to void the judgement for.. -yc2006- ♀ (291 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 10:14:04
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:seek to void the judgement for.. -why-why- ♀ (3077 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 10:59:53
• 謝謝您的回答 ! 祝安康 ! -單身老貓- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 12:47:06
• thank YOU, truly, and take care! -why-why- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 18:48:25
• Thank YOU, truly, and take care! -why-why- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/10/2006 postreply 18:49:23