this is a standard boilerplate contract. it's very one-sided, but this's very common -- when an individual do business with a big company, there is never equal bargaining power. on the face of the contract, there is no time limitation. but there is always an industry standard to fall back on. and the reasonableness and consumer's expectation are inherent in those vague language. the bottom line is that no contract is in vacuum, that's why i thinkg that you have a decent shot under the circumstances.
回複:Any limitation in law?
所有跟帖:
•
Thank you very much, but...
-JessicaZo-
♀
(238 bytes)
()
10/06/2005 postreply
20:49:07
•
回複:Thank you very much, but...
-Jellyfish-
♀
(640 bytes)
()
10/06/2005 postreply
22:19:34
•
The name on contract is not me
-JessicaZo-
♀
(138 bytes)
()
10/06/2005 postreply
20:56:29
•
回複:The name on contract is not me
-Jellyfish-
♀
(343 bytes)
()
10/06/2005 postreply
22:25:21