我現在上訴的主要根據是這個，你們認為我能贏嗎？

來源: 左右為難a 於 2019-12-22 11:45:17 [檔案] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀：次 (1783 bytes)

本文內容已被 [ 左右為難a ] 在 2019-12-22 11:49:02 編輯過。如有問題，請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

回答: 有個案子，我輸了，原規定必須30天內付對方, 我30天內appeal, 就不用付了吧？由左右為難a 於 2019-12-21 16:42:32

我現在無法用對方是否撒謊來上訴對方，隻能question of the law.

整個情節是，有兩個房客居住同一個公寓，女房客（Jiliian）說男房客（Jonathan）有多人居住，5天後沒有任何通知就搬走了，然後編故事告我，然後她居然贏了。

法官判我輸的根據是, 我違反了 RSA 540:13-d：

(a) The tenant proves by clear and convincing evidence of violations; and
(b) The landlord failed to correct the violations within 14 days of the receipt of such written notice or, in an emergency, as promptly as conditions require; and
(c) The violations were not caused by the tenant, a member of the tenant's family or other person on the premises with the tenant's consent; and (d)

我反駁的理由是：

My tenant sent me a text message on 6/13/2019, but she moved out on 6/18/2019 without any notice, which is only 5 days, much shorter than 14 days for me to make a correction. In fact, I called Jonathan on the second day(6/14) after I received her message, and had corrected the issue. There was no any more complaint from her afterward. Jonathan also said he got Jillian's consent before his friends stayed there briefly. So, according to (b) and (c) above, I didn't violate Section 540:13-d.

Even for (a) above, Jillian asked me to keep it between me and her in that text message, the message was proved to be lying too, because she said "several complaints from Management", but the Apartment Management says no any complaints at all.

法官判決書的數額也弄錯了, 因為房客開始也寫錯了。

這種情況能贏嗎？