據俺的理解，the comapny is not violating ADA,

來源: 水中撈月 於 2014-10-24 21:47:40 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (651 bytes)

LZ目前不屬於ADA所界定的qualified worker with disablity,

“For an impairment to be a legal disability, it must be long term. Temporary impairments, such as pregnancy or broken bones, are not covered by the ADA (but may be covered by other laws.)”

www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/reasonable-accommodations-people-with-disabilities-29492.html

reasonable accommodation 也不是說非的在家上班，可以是減輕工作量或其他。

所有跟帖： 

• 你的理解不錯，但是請看這個和ＬＺ類似的２０１４的新案件 -lexm5- ♂ 給 lexm5 發送悄悄話 (352 bytes) () 10/25/2014 postreply 05:39:39

• 那這真要看樓主對‘權’‘益’的想法了 -慧惠- ♀ 給 慧惠 發送悄悄話 慧惠 的博客首頁 (324 bytes) () 10/25/2014 postreply 06:08:49

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！